Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Finance and Foreign Policy
| Author: |
|---|
An Afghan child clutches a can of US-donated cooking oil. Nongovernmental and UN organizations are concerned that the financial crisis will lead developed countries to reduce foreign aid.
With many economists now pointing to a looming recession, spending constraints are likely to further complicate the foreign policy options of the next U.S. president. So far, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) are giving few signs as to how they would alter their priorities. McCain, in the first presidential debate, suggested a spending freeze on all but defense and entitlement programs. Obama said in an interview he might have to delay plans to double foreign assistance. Yet a number of sectors involving national security and foreign appropriations may face a tighter funding environment.
The most budgetary scrutiny could center on defense, where spending (McClatchy) in the most recent fiscal year came close to the $700 billion pricetag of the government's bailout plan for the finance sector. Even before the financial crisis, experts acknowledged that recent growth in defense spending would need to be curtailed. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said in a speech last month at the National Defense University that the Pentagon must be prepared for "inescapable tradeoffs and opportunity costs."
Both Obama and McCain have spoken of the need to reform the Pentagon's procurement system to control costs. In addition, the controversial practice of budgetary supplementals (CQPolitics), which since 2001 have funded the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and global counterterrorism operations separate from the normal budgeting process (at a cost of more than $800 billion), is expected to end no matter which candidate is elected. Meanwhile, military contractors are anticipating a move away from some expensive defense systems (WashPost).
Outside of defense, the biggest expectations for change are in U.S. foreign aid. Such aid has doubled under President Bush to more than $20 billion, with the administration identifying "transformational" foreign aid for weak societies as a national security imperative in the post-9/11 world. Speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative on September 26, both McCain and Obama indicated support for foreign aid programs to fight disease and poverty. Obama pledged to raise foreign aid spending to reduce extreme poverty in the world by half by 2015.
Notwithstanding these pledges, some major nongovernmental humanitarian organizations and officials with several chief UN programs for the poor have expressed concern that the cost paid by developed nations to rescue their battered financial sectors is likely to sharply cut back everything from food aid to disease mitigation. Steven Radelet of the Center for Global Development told Reuters: "Foreign assistance is not going to have the preeminent role that it has had in past years" in Washington. There are also concerns about the appetite developed nations will have for shouldering costs to implement new emissions controls to limit greenhouse gases. Some experts in the field, like UN Special Envoy Kevin M. Conrad, worry the financial crisis will lead to excuses for delaying action. However, Conrad also sees an opportunity for making progress sooner in the new economic climate.
In the area of trade policy, debate is forming over whether a more vigorous trade agenda is better to boost the U.S. economy. Paul Blustein writes in a new paper for the Brookings Institution of the need to turn away from options (PDF) like revising the NAFTA deal, which has been proposed by Obama, and "toward enhancing the system that has underpinned the expansion of global trade for the past 60 years." But Will Straw of the Center for American Progress says this is an appropriate time for the three nations in NAFTA to review their deal. "These talks could be framed as a strategy to strengthen the competitiveness of North America as a whole and to ensure gains in living standards for all Americans, Canadians, and Mexicans," he writes.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
