home > by publication type > daily analysis > After the Troops
Email
| Author: |
|---|
The new presidential administration faces roadblocks to executing its Iraq exit plan. (AP/Maya Alleruzzo)
During the long presidential campaign that ended with a victory for Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) on November 4, few issues defined the candidates as much as the war in Iraq. President-elect Obama vowed to end the war and redeploy troops within sixteen months of taking office; his counterpart, Senator John McCain (R-AZ), said he planned to stay in the fight. With the war for the White House now over, however, politics and policy are headed for a collision course. On Iraq, that means coming to terms with diminishing U.S. influence in Baghdad, experts say.
The immediate focus for Washington war planners will be the terms under which U.S. troops in Iraq operate. A UN Security Council resolution authorizing the presence of foreign forces expires at the end of 2008, and the Bush administration is negotiating with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government for an extension. The status of that agreement has been a political football for months; Iraqi officials say they expect action on a draft plan within days (AP), though a string of prickly issues continues to divide the governments. One interim solution might be an extension of the Security Council resolution; some have called this plan the Bush administration's "fallback option" (WashTimes).
Even if the two sides ink a deal on troop and contractor issues before the first of the year, other changes may weaken Washington's influence. On financial issues, for instance, international auditors have enjoyed open access to Iraq's government spending data courtesy of a 2003 UN measure which, like the troop mandate, expires on January 1. These auditors already have announced plan to relinquish oversight of Iraq's books, causing consternation among observers troubled by accounting irregularities such as hundreds of millions of dollars in missing revenue (PDF). Joseph A. Christoff, director of international affairs and trade for the U.S. Government Accountability Office, which has audited Iraq's finances, tells CFR.org that closing the door to international auditors will destroy any transparency in Iraq's already controversial expenditures. In an email response to questions, Joost Hiltermann, an Iraq expert with the International Crisis Group, says corruption is already rampant in Iraq's budget process; removing oversight, he says, will only make it more so.
U.S. military operations could face new legal challenges, too. For instance, if the draft security pact being negotiated is approved without a substantial overhaul, after January 1 U.S. raids or patrol missions would require prior approval from Iraqi command centers; Iraqis detained by U.S. forces would need to be handed over to local authorities (NYT); and by July 2009, the Americans would be required to relinquish security in Iraq's cities, towns, and villages. Taken together, says Col. Pete Mansoor, a former advisor to Gen. David Petraeus, the changes could give Iraqi lawmakers a free pass to govern with an iron fist (USAToday). "We are banking on the goodwill of the Iraqi government to make exceptions to the agreement if conditions deteriorate," says Mansoor. "But what if the government is causing the deterioration?"
The ballot box could provide that answer; Iraq's political balance of power faces a serious test in the form of provincial elections, now scheduled for before January 31. Splits within the main Shiite bloc hint at a broader struggle for influence. Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies predicts "a decade or more of painful adjustments and power struggles" between Iraqi factions (WashTimes). The extent to which Washington can preserve its leverage during periods of transition in both countries remains unclear. But some analysts say leverage already has shifted east, toward Iran, which has deep historical ties to Iraq's current crop of leaders. Ghassan al-Attiyah, an analyst with the Iraq Foundation for Development and Democracy in London, tells the Washington Post the security pact being negotiated with the U.S. amounts to a battle for influence between Washington and Tehran. A recent analysis of Iranian strategy in Iraq by the Combating Terrorism Center, meanwhile, suggests the mullahs already have the upper hand.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President, experts from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution propose a new, nonpartisan Middle East strategy drawing on the lessons of past failures to address both the short-term and long-term challenges to U.S. interests.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
A selection of Foreign Affairs pieces by and about the preeminent political scientist of the last half century.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 