Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > The Oil Investment Dilemma
| Author: |
|---|
Gas prices dip below $2 in November 2008. (AP/Kim Raff)
A drop of over 50 percent in oil prices from their summer high of $147 per barrel seemed like good news to many beleaguered consumers. Instead, experts are signaling alarm. "Prices are falling, but they're falling for the wrong reasons: because of reduced demand and [as] a consequence of reduced economic activity, not because we have increased supply or increased energy efficiency," BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward said this month (AP). This precipitous drop, coupled with a shaky global financial system, has some oil experts worried about future investments in new oil production. In October, International Energy Agency Executive Director Nobuo Tanaka said delays in investment in oil projects might lead to a supply crunch (WSJ) by 2015.
With prices hovering in the $60-per-barrel range and credit increasingly unavailable, oil producers worldwide are already beginning to rethink investment plans or scale back on existing projects. Small African oil producers face mergers or takeovers (Reuters) given that relying on equity or debt to finance drilling and production may no longer be an option. Small production firms in the Middle East face a similar fate (The National), though the region's state-run oil giants can afford to continue investing from their huge cash reserves.
Oil has also become more costly to extract. An increasing amount of new output comes from more expensive "technically complex fields" (PDF), writes Christine Jojarth of the Global Oil Governance Performance research project at Stanford University. For example, Canada's oil sand development projects need at least a $65-per-barrel oil price just to break even (Canadian Press). Other experts say many new oil projects remain viable even at current prices (DowJones).
The investment picture poses special concerns for producers that are not part of the OPEC oil cartel, some of which are experiencing significant drops in output. A Barclays Capital oil analysis concludes there is no "significant signal in the current supply landscape suggesting we are about to turn the corner and stop the bleed down of non-OPEC supplies" (PDF). Earlier this summer, analysts predicted that Russia, the biggest non-OPEC producer, faced a multiyear production decline due to a lack of investment. An October 2008 report from the International Energy Agency concludes that credit shortages (PDF) "are rapidly becoming yet another in a long line of impediments to industry investment."
Even with record high oil prices, investment in oil development for 2007 remained flat, according to research firm IHS Herold Inc. The firm says that oil company profits have also remained relatively flat, in some cases due to increasing production costs and government uptake of more than 50 percent of industry revenues. The effect of government levies on companies can be crippling. The Russian government recently slashed its export duty of more than $50 dollars per barrel because oil prices are now so low that producers couldn't break even (Platts).
The volatility of oil prices in 2008, leading to gasoline prices over $4 per gallon in some places, aroused concern over U.S. energy security while spurring debate about the best policy path. One initial step was Congress lifting a ban on drilling off most U.S. coasts. The U.S. Government Accountability Office said in an October 2008 report that the agency that handles U.S. oil and gas leases could do more to encourage development (PDF) of existing approved areas for development. At the same time, a September 2008 report from the Center for American Progress, a left-of-center think tank, argues that investing in alternative energy is more likely to spur job growth and alleviate high gas prices than investment in more oil production (PDF). President-elect Barack Obama is contemplating a number of policy options, including asking oil majors to invest profits in alternative energy (LAT) or possibly face a windfall tax. But even with increased support, alternative energy still faces the same credit crunch as the oil industry.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
