Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > campaign 2008 > analysis briefs > Obama's North Korea Dilemma
| Author: |
|---|
North Korean soldiers at the border that separates the two Koreas since the Korean War, Dec. 6, 2008. (AP/ Lee Jin-man)
Foremost among the foreign policy challenges facing the next U.S. administration will be a nuclear North Korea under a Communist regime with a record of proliferation to states unfriendly to Washington. President-elect Barack Obama's two predecessors in the White House have pursued a multilateral engagement policy with Pyongyang. Since August 2003, President Bush has negotiated with North Korea under the Six-Party Talks, which include South Korea, Japan, Russia, and China. The parties offer food and fuel aid in exchange for steps taken by North Korea toward abandonment of its nuclear weapons. But these stop-and-go negotiations have been less than smooth, leading experts to say that Obama will not only face a long, difficult process of working with one of the most intractable regimes in the world, but the challenge of managing deteriorating relations between North and South Korea.
Obama, writing in a 2007 Foreign Affairs article, said he supports "sustained, direct, and aggressive diplomacy." But the problem underlying negotiations with North Korea, experts say, is that Pyongyang has no intention of giving up its weapons anytime soon. "I think we're sort of condemned to that process because we don't really have any alternative," says CFR Vice President Gary Samore, who worked on the Agreed Framework to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue during the Clinton administration. Experts say an alternative approach that would force the issue and potentially provoke a war is not a viable option at this point. The U.S. military is already engaged in two wars, and Pyongyang's neighbors, China and South Korea, are both wary of the potential geopolitical fallout of regime change in North Korea.
Steps taken by the Bush administration this year may complicate the next administration's task. After North Korea handed over a declaration of its nuclear program in June 2008, the Bush administration moved to take Pyongyang off the State Sponsors of Terrorism list and remove restrictions related to the Trading with the Enemy Act. Critics say the report, which only details plutonium-based materials and facilities, falls short on three important counts:
It will be up to the Obama administration to bring uranium enrichment and proliferation issues back to the table as well as to convince Pyongyang to agree to a verification protocol for its plutonium-based materials. In December 2008, the talks reached an impasse (NYT) as North Korea refused to agree in writing to a protocol presented by all the other countries.
Given reports that North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il's health might be failing, Obama may also be confronted with the possibility of leadership change in North Korea. As this Backgrounder notes, some experts fear scenarios revolving around a power struggle, including a full-scale government collapse. Obama also faces calls by some domestic constituents to raise human rights as a priority. In September 2008, the U.S. Congress reauthorized the North Korea Human Rights Act, raising the status of the special envoy authorized by that act to ambassador-at-large rank, as well as providing him with some responsibility over refugee policy. But some analysts urge different tactics. Katharine H.S. Moon, a political science professor at Wellesley College, argues working with international institutions such as the United Nations would yield better results and convey to the regime in Pyongyang that it is not being "singled out for demonization" (PDF). However, in a recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Jay Lefkowitz, President Bush's special envoy for human rights in North Korea, pens a memo to Barack Obama arguing that "it's time to adopt a new approach to North Korea that firmly establishes a link between human rights and security." Lefkowitz calls for talks modeled after the "Helsinki Process" through which western Europe negotiated with the former eastern bloc in the late 1960s and early 1970s. With this in mind, he says Washington should promote linkage among security, economic, and human-rights issues, and insist on verifiable progress in each area as a condition of financial aid or international recognition.
Yet another challenge for the next president will be managing deteriorating relations between Pyongyang and Seoul. Since President Lee Myung-bak came to power in South Korea in February, tensions between the Koreas have been on the rise. In the latest move, Pyongyang threatened to close its border with South Korea, shut down (ABC) cross-border cargo train traffic, and suspended all tours for South Koreans. Bound by a 1954 Mutual Security Agreement to defend South Korea in the event of outside aggression, Washington can little afford for the long-standing dispute on the Korean peninsula to get out of hand.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
