home > the cfr think tank > experts > isobel coleman > Making Aid Work
Email
| Interviewees: | Isobel Coleman, Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations |
|---|---|
| Charles North, Deputy Director, Pakistan and Afghanistan Taskforce, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) | |
| Interviewer: | Jayshree Bajoria, Staff Writer, CFR.org |
April 8, 2009
The new U.S. strategy to fight extremism in Pakistan recommends increasing development and economic assistance to the region. Since 2002, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the principal agency for disbursing U.S. development aid abroad, has been ramping up its program in Pakistan. For the last few years its annual spending in Pakistan has been $400 million; this year's budget is $590 million. USAID's deputy director for the region, Charles North, says education and health care are, and will continue to be, the top development priorities in Pakistan. As this Backgrounder points out, Pakistan spends only about 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) on education and 0.5 percent of GDP on health, resulting in notably low human development indicators.
But Isobel Coleman, CFR's senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy, says she sees the government in Islamabad as "largely dysfunctional" and is skeptical that it would prove to be an effective partner, which is "critical if these programs are to be successful."
Coleman also points out that aid delivery needs to be reformed, which will require better partnerships with local communities. Currently, as North points out, USAID is required to maintain high standards of financial accountability that make it difficult for it to work with local NGOs. "So often we need to work through international organizations that provide that kind of accounting for their resources," he says. But experts say this system of using contractors results in high overhead costs and large amounts of money being channeled back to donor countries. Coleman recommends that the U.S. Congress ease up on some of the accounting requirements. "It has to over time be able to get comfortable with losing money," she says.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
I understand that I may access this podcast solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write webmaster@cfr.org.
Explore the international finance regime with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.