home > the cfr think tank > experts > bronwyn e. bruton > The United States Should Avoid "Grand Schemes" in Somalia
Email
| Interviewee: | Bronwyn E. Bruton, International Affairs Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations |
|---|---|
| Interviewer: | Stephanie Hanson, News Editor, CFR.org |
April 13, 2009
This weekend, U.S. Navy forces killed three Somali pirates in an operation to rescue a U.S. ship captain they were holding hostage. CFR's International Affairs Fellow Bronwyn Bruton says the conflict should have been avoidable, but with the hostage situation playing out so publicly, President Barack Obama didn't have many options. "He didn't want something like a headline saying 'Somali Pirates Escape with American Captain,'" she says. The military operation the United States launched is "at best a Band-Aid," she says. "Unless we are really willing to blanket the area, we can't hope to prevent pirates from taking ships."
Bruton suggests that the recent military operation could cause the pirates to become "more violent than ever before." She explains that Somalis will view U.S. military action as a challenge, and could respond by raising the stakes of their operations. Meanwhile, the Somali public remains largely supportive of the pirates because they are the only group in Somalia that is fighting back against international ships that have been illegally fishing Somalia's waters for years. "Somalis have watched their livelihoods melt away because of this practice," she says. If the United States focuses on piracy too much, it will "increase the backlash against America in Somali minds and ... that will increase radicalization in Somalia and detract from our efforts to bring peace to that country."
Bruton believes that the United States should avoid grand schemes when it attempts to tackle piracy in Somalia. There is an almost unlimited pool of potential pirates in Somalia, and whole villages are surviving on the pirate industry. She suggests that working with local organizations is the only way to influence events on the ground in Somalia. "We have a limited capacity to influence events in Somalia ... but we have an almost unlimited capacity to mess things up," she says.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
I understand that I may access this podcast solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write webmaster@cfr.org.
Explore the international finance regime with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.