Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by issue > terrorism > terrorism and the law > The Devil in the Details on Closing Guantanamo
| Interviewee: | Marisa L. Porges, International Affairs Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations |
|---|---|
| Interviewer: | Greg Bruno, Staff Writer, CFR.org |
May 21, 2009
Amid mounting political opposition to President Obama’s approach to closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, obstacles to closing the camp by the end of January 2010 are increasing, says CFR International Affairs Fellow Marisa L. Porges, a former policy adviser in the Department of Defense’s Office of Detainee Affairs. But beyond timing, Porges says President Obama’s speech at the National Archives on May 21 left a host of unanswered questions.
For one, many observers had been hoping “for an entirely new approach to the detention problem,” says Porges, but Obama appears to be pursuing a path that will continue Bush administration policies, albeit “with minor tweaks.” For instance, how questions of long-term detention are answered, or whether military commissions should fit into the overall legal framework, are similar to Bush administration strategies. Yet Obama is making some clear breaks from the past, Porges says, including the apparent willingness to bring detainees to detention facilities on U.S. soil and the possibility of using the federal criminal system for prosecution. And Porges notes that a number of policy reviews are ongoing and says she expects more specifics to surface in due course.
The key issue going forward, she says, will be the controversial question of transferring some detainees to facilities on U.S. soil. Members of Congress have already sounded the alarm on that front--members of his own party spurned the president this week by refusing to release money out of concern for such a scenario--and Porges says resolving that issue could be the thorniest. “That is going to be the benchmark on which this all turns,” she says.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
I understand that I may access this podcast solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write webmaster@cfr.org.
CFR offers a variety of email newsletters about up-to-date CFR.org material on what’s happening around the world.
Enter your email address and click 'Go' to subscribe.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
