Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > the cfr think tank > experts > lydia khalil > An Army of One?
| Author: | Lydia Khalil, International Affairs Fellow in Residence |
|---|
June 12, 2009
Foreign Policy
Barack Obama is clearly engaged in the Middle East. Unlike other U.S. presidents, he has not waited until the tail end of his presidency to hazard the tar pit of the Arab-Israeli peace process, and has made breaching the rift between the United States and the Muslim world a cornerstone of his foreign-policy agenda. Only six months into his term, Obama's outreach efforts are being credited for the success of the March 14 coalition's victory in Lebanon and the softening of anti-American attitudes throughout the region.
But is all this really the result of an "Obama effect"? Not yet. Domestic political dynamics are the likely explanation for March 14's triumph over Iranian-backed Hezbollah and its allies. And though Middle Easterners are intrigued by the new American president and appreciate his approach, they are also jaded by decades of U.S. policy and are not yet ready to "unclench their fists" to grasp his "open hand."
It is too soon to tell what the ultimate Obama effect will be. On thing is clear, however: Obama cannot truly influence politics in the region if most Middle Eastern citizens have no meaningful way to participate in their governments.
Steering clear of the Bush administration's earnest, but misguided, democratization policies, the Obama administration has opted to speak directly to the peoples of the Middle East instead of pressuring the regimes to be more democratic.
Explore the international finance regime with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
