Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > the cfr think tank > experts > jerome a. cohen > Rough Justice
| Author: | Jerome A. Cohen, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Asia Studies |
|---|
July 9, 2009
South China Morning Post
In 1977, Victor H. Li published a stimulating book titled Law Without Lawyers. China's communists, he suggested, because of their country's distinctive tradition and culture, might blaze a new trail towards modernisation, one that, unlike their former Soviet model, had little need for lawyers. Yet Deng Xiaoping and his colleagues soon demonstrated that they thought otherwise.
After Mao's Zedong's death ended the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, China's new leaders altered the Soviet model for economic development, but resurrected its political-legal system, including its reliance on "socialist lawyers".
Indeed, durig the past three decades, the post-Mao leadership has increasingly expanded the roles of lawyers to help settle disputes, promote the evolving "socialist market economy," foster international business co-operation and legitimate the punishment of serious offenders.
In principle, contemporary Chinese lawyers are no longer Soviet-style "state legal workers" but independent professionals tasked with protecting citizens, including those at odds with the state. But, while their numbers, education and responsibilities have burgeoned, Chinese lawyers, like their Soviet predecessors, suffer many restraints.
The Law on Lawyers amended in 2007 seemed to promise greater autonomy to human rights lawyers. Yet their plight has actually worsened in the 20 months since the 17th Communist Party Congress. The reconfirmed leadership of Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao placed veteran party officials, without legal education or experience but with a strong police background, in charge of the Ministry of Justice and the courts, as well as the Central Party Political-Legal Committee that instructs all legal institutions. These new appointees seem determined to eviscerate the country's "rights lawyers," who constitute a tiny fraction--perhaps 1 per cent--of mainland China's almost 150,000 licensed lawyers.
Local officials under the Ministry of Justice, and the local lawyers associations they control, quietly press activist lawyers not to participate in a broad range of "sensitive" matters or at least to follow their "guidance."
Explore the international finance regime with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
