home > the cfr think tank > experts > peter navario > PEPFAR's biggest success is also its largest liability
Email
| Author: | Peter Navario, Fellow for Global Health |
|---|
July 18, 2009
The Lancet
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) is one of the few foreign policy initiatives inherited by the Obama Administration that is not in crisis-not yet anyway. The recent buzz about the unceremonious dismissal of PEPFAR's well-respected director1,2 and concern about the effects of the global financial crisis on upcoming appropriations has cast an uncertain pall over the USA's global AIDS programme. But these issues are unlikely to derail PEPFAR. What could subvert PEPFAR is failure to adequately emphasise maintenance and adherence in patients now receiving treatment through the programme. The Obama Administration has committed to a robust AIDS programme, which in addition to strong leadership and sustained funding will require a paradigm shift as PEPFAR evolves from an emergency initiative (ie, short-term) into a chronic care programme for developing countries. As a first step, the incoming Global AIDS Coordinator could score a quick win for PEPFAR and the public's health by ensuring that treatment partners devote more resources to supporting patients already on treatment.
Starting 2 million people on treatment also means keeping 2 million on treatment for years (and hopefully decades); failure to do so will undermine the public health and foreign policy achievements of the first 5 years of PEPFAR. PEPFAR's biggest success-support for more than 2 million people on HIV treatment-is also its largest liability.
Explore the international finance regime with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.