Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by issue > global governance > international law > Prisoner of the System
| Author: | Jerome A. Cohen, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Asia Studies |
|---|
July 21, 2009
South China Morning Post
"I hope that one of the messages that goes out is if someone is going to steal proprietary information and steal that information for the benefit of another country, they are going to be charged in this country and face very serious punishment for doing so."
These might have been the words of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs' spokesperson, justifying the detention of four Rio Tinto employees under investigation for stealing state secrets and commercial bribery. Yet they were uttered last week by an American prosecutor, Ivy Wang, following the federal conviction of Dongfan "Greg" Chung, a former Chinese national, for economic espionage relating to the U.S. space program.
Every nation has the right to defend itself against theft of state secrets and commercial bribery. No one should dispute China's right to do so. Then why should Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, himself a China specialist, take the extraordinary step of publicly warning the Chinese Government that the world is watching how it handles the case of Rio Tinto's Stern Hu, a Chinese-born Australian, and his three Chinese co-workers? To paraphrase former President Clinton, "It's the procedure, stupid".
CFR offers a variety of email newsletters about up-to-date CFR.org material on what’s happening around the world.
Enter your email address and click 'Go' to subscribe.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
