home > by issue > proliferation > missile defense > Obama's Missile Shield Revision
Email
| Author: | James M. Lindsay, Senior Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair |
|---|
James M. Lindsay, Senior Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair
U.S. President Barack Obama has wisely decided to revamp the Bush administration's missile defense plans for Eastern Europe. In doing so, however, he has added to his already long list of political challenges abroad and at home.
The system that President George W. Bush proposed be built in Poland and the Czech Republic was mismatched to the threat it was designed to defeat. It would have deployed interceptor missiles that had yet to be tested under real world conditions to defend against long-range missiles that Iran had yet to develop. Meanwhile, the interceptors would have been useless against the short- and medium-range missiles that Iran is rapidly developing.
Obama's revamped program addresses this more immediate threat. It also leaves the door open to deploying long-range interceptors once that technology is proven to work and the Iranian threat advances beyond the merely theoretical.
Obama now has to manage the optics of his decision. Poles and Czechs worry that his decision signals a softening U.S. commitment to their security. Neither country wanted missile defense on its soil because each feared Iranian missiles. Rather, both countries saw the system as a way to tie themselves more closely to the United States and thereby deter an increasingly belligerent Russia.
That tangible reassurance is now gone. Poles and Czechs are left to wonder how much of Obama's decision was driven by a desire to placate Moscow's vehement opposition to the Bush plan. It doesn't help that Obama announced his decision seventy years to the day after the Soviet troops invaded Poland during World War II.
Obama can solve his East European problem with some diplomatic hand-holding. The tougher job will be winning the public relations battle at home. Critics will accuse him of abandoning missile defense rather than revamping it. Critics will also insist that the Poles and Czechs are right: He axed the Bush program in a foolish and doomed bid to "reset" relations with Russia.
Here Moscow isn't likely to be of much help to the White House. The Kremlin will claim a diplomatic victory and it won't offer any concessions in return. The Bush missile defense plan was always a useful whipping boy for Moscow rather than a genuine strategic threat.
The good news for Obama is that the U.S. military leadership unanimously supports his decision to revamp U.S. missile defense plans. If this doesn't help carry the day, it will be a sign that the broader critique of Obama's handling of foreign policy--that he offers too much soft power and not enough hard power--has begun to resonate with a broad swath of the American public.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
CFR offers a variety of email newsletters about up-to-date CFR.org material on what’s happening around the world.
Enter your email address and click 'Go' to subscribe.
CFR Experts are based in CFR’s New York and Washington offices. Each expert's bio page contains his or her contact information, professional and educational history, links to publications and current research, a downloadable one-page biographical narrative, and a high-definition photo.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 