home > by publication type > transcripts > Great Lakes Policy Forum—Meeting Summary—November 1, 1998
Email
| Presider: | Barnett R. Rubin |
|---|---|
| Speakers: | Richard Bogosian, U.S. Department of State |
| Tony Jackson, International Alert | |
| Kathi Austin, Human Rights Watch/Africa |
November 5, 1998
Council on Foreign Relations
[Note: A transcript of this meeting is unavailable. The discussion is summarized below.]
The meeting featured reports by Ambassador Richard Bogosian, special coordinator for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Greater Horn of Africa initiative; Tony Jackson, adviser to the Great Lakes Project for International Alert; and Kathi Austin, consultant to the International Crisis Group. The speaker was Barnett R. Rubin, senior fellow and director of the Center for Preventive Action, Council on Foreign Relations. The discussion dealt primarily with the need to find strategies to approach the numerous interconnected conflicts in the region.
Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo and its External Dimensions
The speakers emphasized several dimensions of the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). First, the conflict is now regional. Although the warring parties rarely carry out large military offensives, the large number of countries and warring groups involved increases the danger that the potential for the conflict to spread. Such escalation from a regional to a continental conflict would make the conflict even more difficult to resolve.
Second, the conflict is becoming thoroughly ethnicized. The ethnic violence and instigation of murder for ethnic reasons are growing. It is much more difficult to control fighters mobilized along antagonistic ethnic lines to carry out large-scale massacres than fighters controlled by states pursuing national objectives.
Third, international actors need to find strategies to deal with the different levels of conflict, balancing a common approach to the continental conflict with specific strategies for specific conflicts. Attention must be given to a Congolese internal political settlement that would make a ceasefire possible and withdrawal of external forces workable.
The U.S. Position
Susan Rice, assistant secretary of state for African affairs, and Gayle Smith, special assistant to the president and senior director for African affairs of the National Security Council, recently visited key capitals of the region during their tour of the DRC, Angola, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Rwanda, and Uganda. While they urged the parties to stop fighting, they did not present a U.S. peace plan. Susan Rice said that their role was to support regional efforts to achieve a negotiated settlement that would lead to the withdrawal of foreign forces and securing the borders in the region. Susan Rice met some of the DRC rebel leaders and governments. She affirmed support for the territorial integrity of the DRC while acknowledging the different concerns of the people and countries involved.
The speakers expressed hope that there would soon be a political settlement that would make some kind of negotiated ceasefire possible. At the 12-nation meeting organized by the Zambian president in Lusaka, plans for a ceasefire were drawn up. In the event of a ceasefire, a peacekeeping force will be needed. Due to the size of the DRC, any peacekeeping operation will be difficult and expensive. One speaker underlined that this would bring the U.S. government face-to-face with domestic considerations and would require funds for such initiatives. While the United Nations might call for action, it might not receive adequate troop commitments.
One speaker suggested the African peoples draw up their own proposals for the United States to support through some form of economic or technical assistance.
Burundi
While Arusha 3, the discussion of democracy and governance, went quite well, the negotiations ended earlier than expected. Nyerere ended the meeting after ten days as a result of insufficient funds.
Meanwhile, Burundi’s economic situation is fragile. The conflict in the DRC is threatening the country by cutting off the last trade route unaffected by sanctions. The government of Burundi and the army are determined to defend their western frontier to insure the transport of goods from the south along Lake Tanganyika. However, they do not seem to be in an offensive mode, going in to attack the DRC. The Burundian government also wants to assure that the National Center for the Defense of Democracy and the Forces for the Defense of Democracy (CNDD-FDD), the Ex-Forces Armees Rwandaise (ex-FAR), and other hostile forces rearmed by Kabila do not approach the border. Furthermore, the World Bank, which is planning to send a mission to Burundi, will not provide assistance as long as the sanctions are in place. One speaker argued that donors should help pay the cost of a ceasefire, which would probably lead to the lifting of sanctions. Programs are needed to retrain the rebel troops and introduce separate functions for the army and the police.
Finally, the fighting continues to rage on in Burundi, and refugees, who continue to flee into Tanzania, exist in terrible conditions. One speaker explained that those refugee camps are highly politicized, and that it is important that their own political needs and representation be taken into account at the negotiating table at Arusha. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) considers this point problematic because it is very difficult to allow a refugee community to have political representation while maintaining the civilian nature of refugee camps.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.