Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > transcripts > Great Lakes Policy Forum—Meeting Summary—May 13, 1999
| Presider: | Barnett R. Rubin, Director of the Center for Preventive Action, Council on Foreign Relations |
|---|---|
| Speaker: | Anthony W. Gambino, Great Lakes Coordinator, USAID |
| Discussant: | David Shorr |
May 13, 1999
Council on Foreign Relations
[Note: A transcript of this meeting is unavailable. The discussion is summarized below.]
This Great Lakes Policy Forum meeting focused on judicial systems in Rwanda and Burundi with a report from Anthony Gambino, Great Lakes Coordinator for USAID, on his recent assessment mission to the region. David Shorr was the discussant and Barnett R. Rubin, Director of the Center for Preventive Action of the Council on Foreign Relations facilitated the discussion.
Decentralization of the Political System in Rwanda
Last March, local elections took place throughout the country to establish new executive and communal development committees. This process represents a commitment by the Rwandan government to empower the population. This democratic process gave Rwandans the unprecedented opportunity to voice their hopes for reconstruction and reconciliation through elected officials.
In the past, power was decentralized only to the level of the Burgomaster, or mayor. These officials maintained an authoritarian hold on their region and played a terrible role in the genocide. The election of the executive and communal committees provides an important counterbalance to the Burgomasters.
Decentralization of the Judicial System in Rwanda
Another major reform is the decentralization of the Rwandan judicial system, although it still requires a lengthy approval process by the parliament. A new judicial process is being established to try the thousands of prisoners who have been accused of killing but not masterminding the genocide. This new system will be modeled after the traditional local process where elders render the verdict. In this case, however, the new judges will be elected by the community.
These judicial reforms present new challenges as well. First, this system would empower nonjudicial actors with judicial powers. Second, attorneys would not be provided for the defendants. Third, it would take many years to try all 125,000 cases, and a great deal of the defendants may die before they go to trial.
Political and Judicial Situation in Burundi
The Arusha Peace process and the Internal Partnership represent true signs of change in Burundi. There is increased political space for both nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the governmental representatives to advocate for reforms, justice, and reconciliation.
However, the Burundian political structure seems to perpetuate a system where an ethnic minority retains control over the state and access to resources. Unlike Rwanda, where a real commitment has been made to empowering the population, Burundian political and judicial structures remain centralized without addressing cultural differences and local concerns.
Although there are efforts being made to improve the Burundian judicial system, it remains biased. Ten thousand people remain in prison while they await judgment.
Any comments please contact Veronique Aubert
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
