home > by region > africa > sub-saharan africa > rwanda > Great Lakes Policy Forum—Meeting Summary—May 13, 1999
Email
| Presider: | Barnett R. Rubin, Director of the Center for Preventive Action, Council on Foreign Relations |
|---|---|
| Speaker: | Anthony W. Gambino, Great Lakes Coordinator, USAID |
| Discussant: | David Shorr |
May 13, 1999
Council on Foreign Relations
[Note: A transcript of this meeting is unavailable. The discussion is summarized below.]
This Great Lakes Policy Forum meeting focused on judicial systems in Rwanda and Burundi with a report from Anthony Gambino, Great Lakes Coordinator for USAID, on his recent assessment mission to the region. David Shorr was the discussant and Barnett R. Rubin, Director of the Center for Preventive Action of the Council on Foreign Relations facilitated the discussion.
Decentralization of the Political System in Rwanda
Last March, local elections took place throughout the country to establish new executive and communal development committees. This process represents a commitment by the Rwandan government to empower the population. This democratic process gave Rwandans the unprecedented opportunity to voice their hopes for reconstruction and reconciliation through elected officials.
In the past, power was decentralized only to the level of the Burgomaster, or mayor. These officials maintained an authoritarian hold on their region and played a terrible role in the genocide. The election of the executive and communal committees provides an important counterbalance to the Burgomasters.
Decentralization of the Judicial System in Rwanda
Another major reform is the decentralization of the Rwandan judicial system, although it still requires a lengthy approval process by the parliament. A new judicial process is being established to try the thousands of prisoners who have been accused of killing but not masterminding the genocide. This new system will be modeled after the traditional local process where elders render the verdict. In this case, however, the new judges will be elected by the community.
These judicial reforms present new challenges as well. First, this system would empower nonjudicial actors with judicial powers. Second, attorneys would not be provided for the defendants. Third, it would take many years to try all 125,000 cases, and a great deal of the defendants may die before they go to trial.
Political and Judicial Situation in Burundi
The Arusha Peace process and the Internal Partnership represent true signs of change in Burundi. There is increased political space for both nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the governmental representatives to advocate for reforms, justice, and reconciliation.
However, the Burundian political structure seems to perpetuate a system where an ethnic minority retains control over the state and access to resources. Unlike Rwanda, where a real commitment has been made to empowering the population, Burundian political and judicial structures remain centralized without addressing cultural differences and local concerns.
Although there are efforts being made to improve the Burundian judicial system, it remains biased. Ten thousand people remain in prison while they await judgment.
Any comments please contact Veronique Aubert
CFR offers a variety of email newsletters about up-to-date CFR.org material on what’s happening around the world.
Enter your email address and click 'Go' to subscribe.
CFR Experts are based in CFR’s New York and Washington offices. Each expert's bio page contains his or her contact information, professional and educational history, links to publications and current research, a downloadable one-page biographical narrative, and a high-definition photo.
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 