home > by publication type > transcripts > A Technology Strategy for Global Warming—National Policy
Email
| Related Bio: | David G. Victor |
|---|
January 28, 2000
Council on Foreign Relations
[Note: A transcript of this meeting is unavailable. The discussion is summarized below.]
Context of the Discussion
The purpose of Session Four of the Study Group on "A Technology Strategy for Global Warming" was to evaluate the role of U.S. national policy in abetting the problem of global warming through increased investment in basic research, the subject of chapter 4 of David Victor’s book.
The chapter pinpoints three actions that the U.S. government might take to combat global warming domestically: price signals (e.g., a carbon tax), investment in applied research, and investment in basic research. Price signals can spur increases in applied research, but they may have little impact on basic energy research. While investment in energy related in R&D in general has increased dramatically over the past few years, investment in energy related basic research has declined. Yet the social rate of return on basic energy investment is high.
The chapter grappled extensively with the problem of realistically quantifying the amount of money that the government currently spends on basic energy research. Because basic research is hard to define, and because the difference between energy and the basic sciences at large is amorphous, the numbers are difficult to pinpoint.
This complication aside, the chapter argues, there is much room for improving energy technologies. For this reason, it is in the U.S. government’s interest to double funding in basic energy research gradually over time, increasing it at 7% per year.
General Comments, Questions, and Concerns
Editorial Critiques:
One participant suggested that the chapter should group basic and applied research and distinguish those categories from diffusion. Another underlined the specific importance of university-based research.
A few participants echoed the critique that the chapter lacks concrete examples and expressed their uneasiness with the numbers cited in the study—one figure reproduced in the chapter reflects a huge drop in energy research in Europe as a whole but a far gentler drop in France. This seems unlikely to a few participants. Another participant pointed out that until a strict assessment of the current expenditures is made, it is hard to be plausible about gradually doubling investment by increasing it by 7% per year.
Models for how the increased investment might be implemented:
The intensification of the world’s forests is an optimal model for the large amount of value that can be added by basic research, one participant pointed out, and queried whether decarbonization could follow a similar template.
The National Institute of Health (NIH), to which the government devotes a considerable amount of money for basic research, is cited repeatedly in the chapter as an admirable example for investment in energy. However, a few participants pointed out that the chapter should minimize its emphasis upon NIH, both because the institute contains many flaws and because it is far easier to mobilize political support for the NIH. Whereas there is strong consensus regarding the fundamental need for medical research, energy is a topic that is far more divisive and controversial.
Drawbacks to investing:
One participant explained that while he agreed with the general goal of increasing investment, the proposed rate of 7% per year is too high—it runs the risk of generating a lot of mediocre research.
A few participants echoed the point that merely increasing investment in research does not guarantee the quality of the results—for this reason basic research is highly risky. Moreover, not all energy research is directed toward decarbonization.
This statement led the group to wonder if there is a human limitation to the number of qualified individuals and worthy projects that an increased investment would support. No consensus emerged. The revised chapter will include indicators of "proposal pressure" and explore whether the 7% rate of funding increase that the chapter advocates would be feasible.
Alternatives to Domestic Increases in Investment:
While the chapter pushes hard for government investment, the group did not overlook the importance of private sector funding, exemplified by the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles program. Some members of the group pointed out that enormous pools of private capital are being mobilized and invested in energy projects. Additionally, the spillover effect to energy from investment in information technology is huge, as some new energy technologies are heavily based on computers and information management (e.g. electric power grids).
One participant emphasized the need to research the design of international institutions, asking whether it would be possible to create incentives within the government to reward fundamental research. We need a culture of international project teams aimed at these issues, and the current environmental field suffers from an ineffectual/inadequate political base. His conclusion was that it is more important to implement change in international institutions than change in our energy budget.
Proposed changes to the chapter:
While the book’s purpose is largely to evaluate the problem of global warming from an international perspective, this chapter argues (and the group agreed) that a clear domestic strategy and a visible national commitment to the problem is essential in order to facilitate progress in the international arena.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Next President:” Richard Holbrooke says the next U.S. president will inherit a more difficult set of international challenges than any predecessor since World War II.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
