Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > op-eds > Rebuilding Iraq
April 15, 2003
National Public Radio
All Things Considered, National Public Radio, April 15, 2003
By Lee Feinstein
The choice between an American-led effort in Iraq and a UN lead is really a false one. A US-UK lead in this early stage is inevitable -- and necessary. And the UN is unlikely to accept the monumental job of administering post-war Iraq.
The UN should be involved in as many aspects of the post-Saddam transition as possible. But, whatever the scope of the UNs role, winning the peace in Iraq will depend ultimately on whether the Bush administration is committed to the long haul.
The recent experience in Afghanistan is a good reference point for what can be expected for post-war Iraq. In Afghanistan, the UN has a wide ranging role, even as the United States and coalition forces operate with a relatively free hand. Following the defeat of the Taliban, for example, the UN sponsored a conference bringing together leading Afghan voices to determine the future of the country at a Loya Jirga. The UNs blessing promoted acceptance of the interim government by diverse Afghan factions and countries in the region, while the United States played the major role behind the scenes.
Today in Afghanistan some 9,000 American and coalition combat troops, under the operational command of the United States, keep up the hunt for Al Qaeda holdouts. Meanwhile, the UN has given its blessing to a peacekeeping force in and around the Afghan capital that is commanded by rotating coalition forces, not the UN. The civilian administration in Afghanistan is also headed, tenuously, by Afghan authorities, who receive support and assistance from a myriad of UN agencies.
But Afghanistan also teaches another lesson. Progress in Afghanistan is uneven. But its the money, not the model that is the problem. The United States is the largest provider of assistance to Afghanistan, but President Bushs talk of a new Marshall Plan never materialized. Meanwhile, international assistance has fallen off, and a lack of political will confines the peacekeeping mission to Kabul, even as the central government loses control over the Afghan countryside.
A UN blessing will be even more critical for post-conflict reconstruction in Iraq because of the Security Council split last fall. Americans dont see it this way, but like it or not, the reality is that a UN blessing will determine whether the war is seen as a liberation or an occupation by much of the world. A significant international role now will make it more likely that nations that did not support the United States before the war will come around to contribute to the reconstruction now. Bringing in UN arms inspectors to witness and document the destruction of weapons of weapons of mass destruction once they are found by coalition forces will be especially critical to the legitimacy of the U.S. effort in the eyes of much of the world.
But as in Afghanistan, winning the peace in Iraq will depend at least as much on whether the Bush administration is prepared to stay the course, and foot the bill. Depending on who is doing the planning, maintaining stability in post-war Iraq will require between 75,000 to 200,000 troops. A blue ribbon commission sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations recently calculated the costs of reconstruction, humanitarian assistance, and security, based on the low troop estimate. The tab is $20 billion a year. Just a portion of these costs could be recouped by sales of Iraqi oil in the near term.
Finding the right role for the UN in post-war Iraq will be critical to meeting US humanitarian responsibilities and diplomatic goals. In Afghanistan, the model is right, but the mission is jeopardized by a lack of money and muscle. The same will hold true for Iraq. Even the best of plans wont stand a chance without a multiyear, multibillion dollar commitment.
Click here for the audio.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
