Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > transcripts > Russia Outside the EU, Inside the WTO?
March 4, 2003
Council on Foreign Relations
[Note: A transcript of this meeting is unavailable. The discussion is summarized below.]
What We Know:
Participants in the March 4 roundtable had the opportunity to discuss the prospects for Russias accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). Russia aims to join the organization by the end of 2003. Progress has been made in a number of key areas and the necessary legislation has been passed. However, a few areas of contention remain, such as energy prices and subsidies for the automobile and aviation industries. They have complicated Russias relations with the EU and may be an obstacle to Russias entry into the WTO. The upcoming elections in December 2003 have also slowed down the impetus for reform.
Russias elite has recognized the importance of joining the WTO for the development of the countrys economy. Membership in the WTO has become one of the major issues on President Putins domestic and foreign economic agenda. It is now a hot topic of debate among Moscow elites. Because Russia expressed little interest in WTO accession in the past, the government today has only a handful of foreign trade specialists.
There are several factors that contributed to Russias current interest in joining the organization:
WTO membership has a number of advantages for Russia:
Russia is in a better position to join the organization than China. Russia needs to negotiate only 25 to 30 accession chapters, while China had to negotiate about 200. Russias agricultural subsidies are already low and the government has agreed to open the insurance market and the banking sector.
The most problematic areas are subsidies for the aviation and the car industries which are not competitive and are poorly managed. They are controlled by powerful oligarchs and negotiation in these areas is likely to face significant opposition.
Energy pricing is another area of contention, especially between Russia and the European Union. Oil and coal prices are free but gas prices are not. The EU maintains that gas prices need to reach market level and be increased up to five times their current price. Disagreement over gas prices could block Russias WTO entry, even though Russia has been officially accepted as a market economy.
The dispute over the price of natural gas has further fueled Russias disillusionment with the European Union. EU protectionism has hampered Russian trade with the Union. For example, EU decreased grain quotas for Russia by ninety-nine percent. Russia was not able to do anything because it is not a member of WTO. However, by joining the organization, Russia will have the means and the leverage to dispute decisions that cripple its foreign trade.
What We Dont Know:
How difficult will it be for Russias economy to restructure further?
While Russia has achieved more openness than economies of similar size, there are still many problems underneath the surface. Russias recent economic growth has not solved the structural problems of the Russian economy. Economic activities are widely dispersed across Russias territory and there is not enough border openness and cross-border integration. Parts of the Russian economy are still closed and the hidden economy is still very strong. WTO accession will bring these challenges and other structural problems to the fore.
How strong is opposition to reform, especially at the local level?
The greatest barrier to implementing WTO regulations is latent opposition at the regional and local level. Local manufacturers also enjoy significant local political clout. Highly inefficient manufacturers benefit from low gas prices and non-transparent regulations and transactions. Therefore, WTO membership is not in their interest. In some industries powerful oligarchs could also obstruct implementing WTO regulations.
How will the election cycle affect reforms?
There are already signs that the momentum for reform has been slowed down by the upcoming elections at the end of 2003. Russian political elites are gearing up to win voters and support from different oligarchic groups rather than introducing new laws and more reforms that may be unpopular. Important legislation, such as intellectual property laws and bankruptcy laws, have been put on hold until after the elections.
What are the next steps; what should be done and by whom?
Western countries should facilitate Russian entry into the WTO. Western countries could use WTO membership to encourage Russia to increase transparency, reduce bureaucracy, and introduce key legislation, such as intellectual property laws.
Accession to the World Trade Organization is also an important lever for Putin to push further economic reform. The tough demands of WTO membership will allow the Russian president to introduce legislation pushing for more transparency and legal protection and become more forthcoming in opening the Russian market which may not be popular with certain oligarchic groups and factory managers.
Russia and the WTO countries need to set up a realistic timeline for Russias membership. Although the current government would like to see Russia join the organization in time for the elections in the end of this year, it is more likely that Russia will become a WTO member in 2004 or later.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
