home > by publication type > transcripts > The Domestic Politics of Russia's Foreign Economic Policy
Email
April 14, 2003
Council on Foreign Relations
[Note: A transcript of this meeting is unavailable. The discussion is summarized below.]
1. What we know:
A number of different actors and interests groups are involved in determining Russia’s economic policy on integration into the world economy and issues, such as World Trade Organization (WTO) membership, and relations with the United States and the EU. Each interest group pursues its own economic policy agenda. Some support the liberalization of Russia’s economy and its integration into the world economy, while others oppose it.
President Putin has a major stake in determining Russia’s economic agenda abroad. He understands the necessity of Russia’s integration into the world economy and supports free trade. Overall, he could be considered a positive factor in liberalizing Russia’s economy.
There are three circles around the president with competing foreign policy agendas. First, the so-called “family, ” the former Yeltsin team, represents various oligarchic groups whose interests are very divided. The economic circle, consisting of former St. Petersburg economists, pushes a liberal economic agenda and supports Russia’s integration in the global economy. Third, the security circle, consisting of members of Russia’s security apparatus, is the most protectionist and least interested in integrating Russia into the global economy.
The ministries of the Russian federal government are also able to influence the economic policy agenda to a different extent depending on their portfolios. Some are for free trade and the liberalization of Russia’s economy, while others are more protectionist.
The most liberal and pro-free trade is Russia’s Economic Ministry headed by German Gref. It has been a major driving force behind the debate on Russia’s WTO accession. Gref’s ministry is responsible for legislation of trade regulation and economic reform. The Finance Ministry is another part of the government with a liberal economic agenda. It is responsible for managing Russia’s foreign debt and is interested in Russia’s participation in the foreign financial markets. The Ministry of Foreign Relations promotes Russian economic interests, but not very effectively.
Some ministries, such as the Ministry of Defense, do not support the liberalization of Russia’s economy and free trade. Many of Russia’s generals believe that Russia should be self-sufficient and does not need to become a part of the world economy. At the same time, this ministry represents the Russian military industrial complex, which is in fact interested in selling Russian arms in foreign markets.
Other parts of the federal government, such as the Customs Committee, are also against Russia’s integration in the world economy and WTO accession because they benefit from the lack of transparency and clearly-established rules.
The Russian Duma has very little influence on Russian economic policy. It mostly represents the interests of different lobbies and oligarchic groups with competing agendas. The interests of Russia’s oligarchs and business groups are much divided. Some of them, such as the oil companies, already participate in the international market. They support liberalization and free trade. At the same time, they are afraid of foreign competition and are ambivalent about foreign investment. Others, representing industries that will be affected by Russia’s WTO accession, oppose trade liberalization and the lifting of subsidies for their industries.
2. What we don’t know:
How will this conglomeration of interests play out in Russian international economic policy?
It is difficult to predict what Russian international agenda will be with so many actors and interests at stake. This conglomeration of interests is more likely to produce a messy rather than a coherent Russian foreign economic policy agenda. In the long term, free trade will probably win, although protectionists may have small victories in the shorter term.
What will be the effect of the war in Iraq on Russia’s international economic agenda?
Putin’s position on Iraq eliminated the opportunity for Russia to take part in post-war reconstruction in Iraq. The Iraq issue has already hampered Russia’s chances for accession to the WTO and will continue to affect Russia’s relations with the United States. It is possible that Putin will try to redress the situation since he recognizes the importance of partnership with the United States. Putin values his relationship with President Bush and also supports liberalization and integration of Russia into the global economy.
Putin’s support for France and Germany regarding the Iraq war may temporarily improve Russia’s relationship with the EU. The European Union has created many obstacles to Russia’s eventual accession to the WTO. Russia and the EU have competing interests and their disagreement over important issues, such as gas prices and agricultural subsidies, are likely to persist.
Will public attitude have any effect on Russia’s agenda?
The Russian public is against free trade and does not believe in international institutions. There is very little popular support for Russia’s WTO membership. At the same time, few among the Russian public oppose WTO accession since most of Russia’s population does not know anything about the organization. This lack of knowledge, in addition to the high popularity and the strong hand of the Russian president, will push WTO accession and a liberal economic agenda.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.