Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > backgrounder > AFGHANISTAN: The New Constitution
| Author: | Sharon Otterman |
|---|
January 6, 2004
The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, approved January 4 by a 502-member assembly in Kabul, creates a nation that pledges to be both Islamic and democratic. It establishes a presidential system that roughly follows the U.S. model, dividing government power among executive, legislative, and judicial branches. While it does not include an explicit reference tosharia, or Islamic law, it states that no Afghan law "can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions" of Islam. Experts say the extent of Islam's influence in practice will hinge on who controls Afghanistan's government.
A 35-member team that included Afghans and foreign legal experts spent a year working on the draft constitution. At a nationwide series of public meetings, nearly a half-million Afghans were asked what they thought should be included in the constitution. The draft was written in relative secrecy and, after several delays, the final version was released in November 2003. Beginning in mid-December, a constitutional loya jirga, or grand council, consisting of a diverse set of Afghan representatives appointed by provincial authorities and transitional government officials, began to debate the document. It was approved after three weeks of council sessions.
The constitution became the official law of the land when it was approved. But until general elections are held, power will remain with Afghanistan's transitional government, which has been in place since June 2002 and is headed by President Hamid Karzai. Presidential elections are scheduled for June 2004, but experts say that delays in voter registration caused by the nation's dangerous security conditions will delay them. September is the earliest that elections can go forward, says Barnett Rubin, the director of studies at the Center on International Cooperation at New York University and a constitutional adviser to the Afghan government. Elections for the National Assembly will likely be delayed further--perhaps until mid-2005, Rubin says.
Major judicial reform and the creation of the new Supreme Court will not get under way until the new government is seated, experts say. The transitional judicial system is beginning to function, but most of the judges are religiously trained mullahs, says Said Arjomand, a sociology professor at the State University of New York at Stony Brook and an adviser to Afghanistan's constitutional loya jirga. The nation's current chief justice, Fazl Hadi Shinwari, has outlawed cable television, opposes co-education, and is said to practice the strict form of Islam called Wahhabism. Arjomand says there is a government working group on judicial reform, but as of last month it hadn't yet met.
Widespread lawlessness, which has increased since the fall of the repressive Taliban regime in 2001, many experts say. Contributing to the problem are regional militias controlled by so-called warlords, widespread opium cultivation, and the weakness of the poorly funded national army, which has fewer than 10,000 soldiers. Outside of the capital, Kabul, the central government's authority is weak. National acceptance of the constitution--and the success of the Afghan state--depend on a steady spread of the government's writ.
It will be headed by a president who will be directly elected to a five-year term. The president must be Muslim, an Afghan citizen born of Afghan parents, and may be re-elected only once. His responsibilities will include:
The National Assembly of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan will consist of two houses: the Wolesi Jirga, or House of the People, and the Meshrano Jirga, or House of Elders. The Wolesi Jirga is the more powerful house. Its 250 delegates will be directly elected through a system of proportional representation. According to the constitution, at least 64 delegates--two from each province--must be women. It has the primary responsibility for making and ratifying laws and approving the actions of the president.
The Meshrano Jirga will consist of an unspecified number of local dignitaries and experts appointed by provincial councils, district councils, and the president. It must also ratify laws, but its decisions about the state's budget and development programs can be overruled by the Wolesi Jirga.
The republic's top court is the Stera Mahkama, or Supreme Court. Its members will be appointed by the president for 10-year terms. There are also High Courts, Appeals Courts, and local and district courts. Eligible judges can have training in either Islamic jurisprudence or secular law.
It will base its judgments on existing Afghan law--much of which is rooted in Islamic law--and the new constitution. In cases in which no law covers a particular issue, the courts' decisions will be "within the limits of the constitution" and in accord with Islamic jurisprudence. On cases of possible discord between the constitution and Islam, the Supreme Court will have to arrive at a compromise. "A secular judge could overrule sharia, but a fundamentalist court could rule the other way around," says Arjomand. "It all depends on who will review the laws."
Women's rights is one main area. The constitution states that "the citizens of Afghanistan--whether man or woman--have equal rights and duties before the law" and includes special provisions to encourage women's access to education and government. But traditional Islamic law treats men and women differently in some cases, and existing law in Afghanistan maintains some of these distinctions. "I am not really satisfied because of the contradictions," said Ahmad Nadery, commissioner of Afghanistan's independent human rights commission, in an interview with The Los Angeles Times. "If a conflict arises between an international [human rights declaration] and the country's law, it doesn't say which has precedence. If we have a conservative judicial system--which we do--it will interpret the laws in a conservative way."
Among them:
All people living in Afghanistan are to be considered Afghan, regardless of their ethnic background. However, the constitution does grant each of the nation's 14-plus ethnic groups the right to speak its own language. The country's official languages will be Pashto, spoken by Pashtuns, the nation's largest ethnic group, and Dari, a form of Persian spoken predominately by Tajiks and Hazaras, who together are some 35 percent of the population. The national anthem will be sung in Pashto only. However, in a final-hour concession that saved the constitutional negotiations from failure, other languages will be recognized as third national languages in regions where they are spoken by a majority.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
