home > by publication type > backgrounders > IRAN: European Nuclear Negotiations
Email
| Author: | Esther Pan |
|---|
April 14, 2005
On November 29, 2004, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) passed a resolution welcoming Iran's recent agreement with three European nations to freeze temporarily all uranium enrichment, reprocessing, and conversion-related activities. The endorsement meant Iran will not face United Nations Security Council sanctions for its nuclear activities in the near future. U.S. diplomats favored a tougher negotiating line because they believe the Islamic Republic is secretly pursuing nuclear weapons. The agreement states that the enrichment freeze will remain in effect until a final pact is negotiated, a process expected to take up to two years. Many experts say the chances this deal will lead to a permanent ban on uranium enrichment are slim.
An arrangement negotiated by the so-called troika of Britain, France, and Germany to resolve the ongoing standoff with Iran over its illicit nuclear program. On November 14, Iran agreed to an immediate freeze of nuclear activities. In return, Tehran received promises of assistance for its civilian nuclear-energy program and a package of economic and trade incentives. The deal was hailed in some quarters as a diplomatic success. However, some experts warned that it leaves room for Tehran to potentially produce nuclear weapons in the future.
In return for agreeing to the freeze, Iran was promised a package of incentives, including:
IAEA inspectors will report violations to the IAEA board, which can take disciplinary measures, including referral of Iran to the Security Council. In addition, Iran and the troika agreed to set up three working groups: on nuclear issues, non-nuclear collaboration between Iran and Europe, and regional security. These groups will meet to continue the negotiations and report every three months to senior diplomats from each country.
IAEA inspectors will report violations to the IAEA board, which can take disciplinary measures, including referring Iran to the Security Council. In addition, Iran and the troika will set up three working groups: on nuclear issues, non-nuclear collaboration between Iran and Europe, and regional security. These groups will meet to continue the negotiations and report every three months to senior diplomats from each country.
That its vague language could permit Iran to continue an illicit nuclear program. "They're saying that the suspension will last as long as the talks, but they could stop the talks at any time," says Charles D. Ferguson II, science and technology fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Disagreements over interpretation caused the failure of the last deal brokered by the troika in October 2003.
In October 2003, negotiators persuaded Iran to suspend temporarily all uranium-enrichment programs, including the manufacture of centrifuges; to give a full and complete declaration of its activities to the IAEA; and to open the country to increased inspections under the Additional Protocol. In return, the Europeans promised to provide technological assistance for nuclear energy and help resolve the IAEA investigation. After six months, the Europeans claimed Iran was still hiding information about its nuclear program, while Iran said it had never received the promised technology from Europe. In June 2004, Tehran backed out of the pact and threatened to resume manufacturing centrifuges and related enrichment activities.
-- by Esther Pan, staff writer, cfr.org
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.