home > by publication type > backgrounder > BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: A Decade After Srebrenica
Email
| Author: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
July 7, 2005
The ICTY was established in 1993 by the U.N. Security Council to bring to justice those responsible for war crimes in the Balkans after 1991, when the former Yugoslavia began to disintegrate. The tribunal has so far indicted 162 individuals, the majority of them ethnic Serbs, ranging in importance from high-ranking political figures to lowly field generals. Around 80 suspects are currently either in custody or awaiting trial; 10 remain at large. Some experts say Balkan governments may feel additional pressure to hand over the remaining fugitives in the coming weeks as Europe commemorates the tenth anniversary of the July 11, 1995, massacre of more than 7,000 Muslim men in the Bosnian village of Srebrenica. The two Bosnian Serbs most responsible for the Srebrenica genocide, Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic, remain at large.
Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica and other political leaders in the region have failed to cooperate with the ICTY's order to arrest the most wanted war-crime suspects, experts say. Some of these leaders fear a political backlash, given the reputation of Mladic and Karadzic as war heroes among many Serbs. Others refuse to recognize the ICTY's legitimacy. "Many of them see the court as a political instrument of the West, and consequently don't see it as a clear-cut case of complying with justice," says William L. Nash, director of the Council on Foreign Relations' Center for Preventive Action. On the other hand, experts also say it's unclear if the governments in the region know where these fugitives are hiding.
The Srebrenica massacre is considered by many to be the worst human-rights atrocity committed on European soil since World War II. U.N. officials say the massacre also marked a low point for the international body's ability to protect civilians in the former Yugoslavia, as the Muslim enclave in the mountainous part of eastern Bosnia was a U.N.-declared "safe area," supposedly protected by Dutch peacekeepers, when it was overrun by Bosnian-Serb forces. Carla Del Ponte, the ICTY's chief prosecutor, said she would boycott the commemoration ceremonies if Mladic and Karadzic were not arrested. Serbian President Boris Tadic, despite protests by Bosnian Muslims, has said he will attend the July 11 commemoration.
Experts say the motivations for the massacre are still unclear. The Bosnian war erupted in 1992 when Serbia, which is primarily Serbian Orthodox, attempted to prevent Bosnia, which is predominately Muslim, from declaring independence and breaking away as an independent state. Some say the slaughter at Srebrenica in the waning months of the war was part of Karadzic's "endgame" strategy to secure the last remaining Muslim enclaves in the region. Others point to a television interview Mladic gave around the time of the massacre in which he said the slaughter at Srebrenica was to exact revenge on the town's Muslims for killing ethnic Serbs during a revolt 150 years earlier. (The Bosnian war ended in November 1995 with the signing of the U.S.-brokered Dayton Accords.)
Ten years on, many Serbs have not come to terms with the events of Srebrenica, or believe the bloodshed was overblown by the media, says Kelly Askin, a senior legal officer for the Open Society Institute. However, she says, there was shock after video footage--found by the Humanitarian Law Fund, a Belgrade-based human-rights group, and aired on Serbian television June 2--showed six Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica killed execution-style by a Serbian paramilitary unit called the Scorpions. Other videos showing similar atrocities are believed to exist, experts say. "As a result of the video, more people understand that something terrible happened, that this wasn't something made up by the international community," says Janusz Bugajski, a Balkans expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "It's created lots of discussion on the subject: the role of Belgrade, the role of the [Serbian Orthodox] church. But I still don't see this as creating a sea-change in public opinion."
Although Kostunica issued a recent statement acknowledging Serbia's role in the "massive crime," in late June, Serbia's parliament failed to pass a resolution condemning the massacre. Some say the resolution may have failed because it would adversely affect an ongoing suit filed by the Bosnian government in the International Court of Justice against Belgrade alleging its use of genocide during the war.
Among the 10 war-crimes suspects still at large, three have a $5 million bounty on their heads from the U.S. government. They are:
Momentum appears to be in the ICTY's favor, experts say. A June 17 poll by the Belgrade-based Strategic Marketing and Media Research Institute shows for the first time that more Serbs are in favor of arresting Mladic than letting him go free. Serbia is also increasingly bowing to pressure from the United States and European Union to cooperate with the war tribunal, experts say. So far this year, Serbia has surrendered 14 war-crimes suspects, six of whom were involved with the Srebrenica massacre.
"It has the bully pulpit," Nash says, including the authority to issue arrest warrants. But although its rulings are binding under international law, the tribunal has no police force or power to carry out these arrests. Instead its judges must rely on individual governments to enforce their rulings. The trouble is, as Nash points out, "It's naive to think they can force a sovereign government to do something it doesn't want to do." Another recourse the court has to enforce compliance is to put pressure on U.N. Security Council members to issue sanctions, freeze assets, or withhold aid.
In January, the United States denied reconstruction aid to Serbia for its failure to cooperate with the ICTY, a move later reversed once Belgrade complied with the court and handed over several suspects. The European Union has said accession talks for Serbia and Montenegro, pushing to be on track for EU membership by 2012, are on hold until Mladic, Karadzic, and others are arrested. "What Serbs know is that unless they turn him over, Mladic will be an albatross around their neck that prevents them from joining NATO's [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] Partnership for Peace and destroys any hopes of them joining the European Union," says Edgar Chen, legal liaison for the Coalition for International Justice.
The ICTY is set to expire in 2008, but experts say the chief prosecutor may ask the U.N. Security Council for a two- to three-year extension. Some say Mladic and Karadzic are trying to wait out the ICTY's expiration date to avoid arrest. Del Ponte, however, has said she will not dissolve the court until these two men have been arrested. The U.N. Security Council has pressured the ICTY to wrap up its work, given its $100 million annual price tag--around $20 million of which is supplied by the United States.
-- by Lionel Beehner, staff writer, cfr.org
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
In this report, Bruce W. MacDonald illuminates the strategic landscape of military space competition between the United States and China and highlights the dangers and opportunities the United States confronts in space.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“ The Latter-Day Sultan:” Akbar Ganji says that blaming Iran's problems on President Ahmadinejad inaccurately suggests that Iran's problems will go away when Ahmadinejad does.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
