home > by publication type > backgrounders > Afghan Parliamentary Elections
Email
| Author: | Esther Pan |
|---|
September 16, 2005
Four years after the fundamentalist Taliban regime was overthrown by a U.S.-led coalition, experts say the September 18 elections—the first ever free, democratic parliamentary elections in Afghanistan—could herald a new start for the war-ravaged country. Some 12.5 million Afghans are registered to vote in the parliamentary poll, which comes one year after Hamid Karzai was elected in the country’s first free presidential election. Yet some fear progress could be hindered if members of the Taliban or warlords who still control wide swathes of the country win substantial representation in parliament.
The new National Assembly will have two chambers, a directly elected lower house, the Wolesi Jirga, and an upper house, the House of Elders, composed of appointed and indirectly elected candidates. On Sunday, Afghan voters will cast two ballots: one for candidates for the Wolesi Jirga, and one for candidates to sit on provincial councils in each of the thirty-four provinces. The leaders of the provincial councils will join district council heads, to be elected next year, and presidential appointees in the House of Elders. There are 249 seats in the Wolesi Jirga. The House of Elders will have fifty-one seats, half its eventual total, until district council elections are held next year.
There will be over 1,000 Afghan election observers, and hundreds of international ones, on hand to monitor Sunday’s election. The European Union sent a 100-member observer mission to Afghanistan, headed by Emma Bonino, an Italian member of the European Parliament. The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, UNAMA, is deploying dozens of its staff around the country to monitor the elections. Other countries are also participating, including Japan, which sent a three-member team.
Its members are denouncing the elections as a foreign-organized “farce” and threatening Afghans who vote, saying they could get caught in attacks against polling stations. Even before the official campaign period began August 15, Taliban members had been using violence and threats to intimidate or kill candidates, election workers, civilian contractors, and moderate clerics. Nearly 1,000 people, including more than fifty U.S. soldiers and seven parliamentary candidates, have been killed in militant violence so far this year. It is the highest death toll in Afghanistan since the Taliban was overthrown in 2001. Experts say they are worried that the threats, especially in the countryside and the Taliban strongholds of the central and southern regions, will deter Afghans from going to the polls.
Other current and former Taliban members have taken a different road and are running for office. Some of these candidates have heeded Karzai’s call to disarm—including former Taliban deputy interior minister Mullah Mohammed Khaksar—and some have not. The electoral commission has barred nearly fifty candidates from running for election because of their ties to armed militias.
Sixty-eight seats in the Wolesi Jirga, just more than one quarter of the total, are reserved for women. Local councils in all thirty-four provinces will also have one quarter of their seats filled by women, and one-sixth of the seats in the House of Elders are set aside for women. More than 500 women are running nationwide—although social restraints in some parts of the country, including the conservative Pashtun south, have led to a paucity of candidates in some areas. Masouda Jalal, the country’s minister for women’s affairs, says many thousands more women wanted to run for office but couldn’t afford to pay campaign expenses. In addition, in most traditional Afghan households husbands control the finances, and many have been unwilling to support their wives’ candidacies. But women are not being deterred from participating in the elections: 44 percent of newly registered voters this year are women.
About seventy to eighty candidates under thirty are running for the Wolesi Jirga, where the minimum age is twenty-five. Roughly 150 candidates are under the age of thirty-five. The minimum voting age in Afghanistan is eighteen, and experts say they expect a strong turnout from young people, whose main priorities are establishing security and expanding opportunities for education.
More than 100,000 Afghan and foreign troops will provide security for the elections. The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO sent an additional 2,000 troops from Spain, Romania, and the Netherlands to Afghanistan in early September, bringing its total force to 11,000 in the days before the elections. NATO and U.S. officials are currently in talks about the future structure of these forces. The United States is reportedly considering withdrawing some 4,000 soldiers, about 20 percent of its current troop presence, next spring. There are currently some 20,000 U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, mostly in the south and east, where they are in charge of fighting Taliban and al-Qaeda forces.
For the elections, ISAF troops will provide security in the capitol, Kabul, and the northern and western parts of Afghanistan, which are under the NATO security umbrella. However, primary responsibility for security at the more than 6,000 polling stations on election day will lie with some 50,000 members of the Afghan National Army and the Afghan National Police, who did the same job in last year’s presidential election.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.