Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
![]()
Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
Navigation
home > by publication type > backgrounder > Shining Path, Tupac Amaru (Peru, leftists)
Updated: November 2005
There are two main rebel groups operating in Peru, both leftist: the Maoist Shining Path (known in Spanish as Sendero Luminoso) and the Cuban-inspired Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (Movimiento Revolucionario Tupac Amaru). Their attacks terrorized Peru for decades before they were beaten back in a 1990s crackdown, but a March 2002 car bomb attack near the U.S. embassy in Lima summoned up old Peruvian fears of terrorism. The State Department still identifies both groups as terrorist organizations.
In the 1980s and early 1990s, vicious terrorist attacks were daily occurrences across Peru . Shining Path and Tupac Amaru were notorious for indiscriminate bombings, assassinations, brutal killings, kidnappings, bank robberies, and attacks on Western embassies and businesses. The human and economic toll was devastating, and Peruvians have a particular dread of terrorism to this day. Human rights groups estimate that more than 30,000 people have died since the rebels took up arms two decades ago. In 2003, a government commission blamed Shining Path for about fifty-four percent of the violent deaths caused by the civil war.
Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori waged an aggressive and highly successful campaign against Shining Path and Tupac Amaru. Fujimori, originally an elected leader, seized near-dictatorial powers in April 1992, with military support, and disbanded Peru’s congress and courts, which he said were limiting his ability to crack down on terrorism. Within a few years, Fujimori had captured most of the leaders of the rebel groups, and terrorism subsequently declined sharply. Thousands of Peruvians were convicted of terrorism-related charges and sentenced to life imprisonment by military courts. Human rights activists accuse the Peruvian military of committing widespread human rights abuses during the crackdown, including the jailing of thousands of innocent Peruvians.
But in 2003, Peru’s constitutional court struck down the anti-terror laws enacted under Fujimori and as a result more than 1,900 jailed members of the Shining Path have been given the right to request retrials in civilian court, including the group’s leader Abimael Guzman—who was captured and jailed in 1992.
A Peruvian military tribunal convicted an American, Lori Berenson, of terrorism in 1996 and sentenced her to life in prison. After protests by the U.S. government, Peru retried Berenson in a civilian court in 2001. She was convicted of aiding Tupac Amaru and sentenced to twenty years in prison, where she remains.
Experts say the groups arose in response to Peru ’s entrenched system of race- and class-based discrimination, which has deeply impoverished most of the country's population, especially citizens of indigenous descent.
Both groups seek to topple the existing Peruvian government and impose their own communist regimes.
Shining Path, established in the late 1960s by the former university professor Abimael Guzman, is a militant Maoist group that seeks to install a peasant revolutionary authority in Peru. The group took up arms in 1980, and its ranks once numbered in the thousands. Experts consider it one of the world’s most ruthless insurgencies; Shining Path often hacked its victims to death with machetes. The group, which now has only several hundred members remaining, operates mainly in jungle areas.
Tupac Amaru, named for an 18th-century rebel leader who fought Spanish colonial control, was founded on many of the communist principles that led to the Cuban revolution. The group, which is Marxist and wants to rid Peru of all imperialist elements, took up arms in 1984 and at its height had close to 1,000 members, mainly in rural areas. Experts consider Tupac Amaru less violent than Shining Path. Tupac Amaru members, who normally conceal their identities by wearing bandannas, have tried to promote a Robin Hood image of stealing from the rich to help the poor. The group is best known for its 1996 takeover of the Japanese ambassador’s residence in Lima. Most of Tupac Amaru’s leaders were killed in 1997 when Peruvian forces raided the Japanese compound and freed the hostages. The group has fewer than 100 members today.
Shining Path is not sponsored by any state and has no known links to other terrorist groups. It considers itself the only remaining true communist revolutionary movement. According to David Scott Palmer, a professor of Latin American studies at Boston University , Tupac Amaru initially received support and some training from Cuba and has historical ties to two leftist insurgent groups, the FARC in Colombia and the FMLN in El Salvador , where some Tupac Amaru rebels fought. These associations waned with the end of the Cold War and Tupac Amaru's own decline. Shining Path and Tupac Amaru have no known ties to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network.
No. There is bad blood between them. Shining Path sees Tupac Amaru’s fighters as traitors to communism. In the past, the two groups have fought each other for members and for the “taxes” that they both collect from cocaine smugglers operating in jungle areas under rebel control. Peru is the world's second-largest producer of cocaine (after Colombia), and such “taxes” are a major source of revenue for the insurgents.
No. Most Peruvians regard Shining Path and Tupac Amaru as terrorists who caused thousands of deaths and untold suffering. But despite the Peruvian government’s successful antiterrorist campaign, the rebels retain a small number of sympathizers among the rural poor.
Peruvian and American authorities say that since Fujimori’s crackdown, terrorism has not been a problem in Peru . But in March 2002, just days before President Bush became the first sitting American president to visit Peru , a powerful car bomb exploded in a shopping arcade across from the U.S. embassy in Lima . U.S. and Peruvian officials say the bombing, which killed nine people and injured thirty others, was reminiscent of past Shining Path attacks. Some terrorism experts have warned that Shining Path is regrouping and recruiting new members, but few Peru-watchers believe that the group can regain its prior scale.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
![]()
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
![]()
![]()
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
![]()
![]()
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
![]()
![]()
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
![]()
By Region | By Issue | By Publication Type | The Think Tank | For The Media | For Educators | About CFR
Home | Site Index | FAQ | Contact | RSS | Podcast
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.

