Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > op-eds > Continental drift
| Author: | Julia E. Sweig, Nelson and David Rockefeller Senior Fellow for Latin America Studies and Director for Latin America Studies |
|---|
January 21, 2006
International Herald Tribune
Although Bolivia is usually off Washington’s radar screen, the inauguration of Evo Morales, the Aymara Indian overwhelmingly elected president last month, portends a new era for U.S.-Latin American relations.
It is one for which the United States is ill-prepared, given its historic antipathy for the left in the Western Hemisphere and our more recent ideological fervor for free markets at all cost.
Although the Bush administration preaches the virtues of democracy, its reaction to the recent surge of left-leaning electoral victories in Latin America has been one hand clapping.
That’s because all these victories—Morales in Bolivia, Nestor Kirchner in Argentina, Michelle Bachelet in Chile—share an anti-American tone to one degree or another. Future elections in Peru, Mexico, Ecuador and Nicaragua are also likely to have an anti-American flavor.
That’s hardly a surprise, given recent and past history.
Latin American politics are no longer mainly about dependence on U.S. muscle and political power. Rather, they are about how to narrow the region’s profound political and class cleavages.
How the new governments will harness their countries’ resources to achieve this goal is the real story unfolding in the region.
The true indication of whether the region’s new leaders can turn democratic accomplishment into a socially inclusive economic agenda will be their ability to recruit their countries’ traditional elites.
Currently, Latin American governments receive only 8 to 15 percent of their GDP from tax revenue about one-third that of industrialized countries. A good measure of elite participation will be whether that rate goes up.
Economies cannot grow without a public sector that invests in roads, healthcare, education and technology, and without an open political and business culture that respects an independent judiciary.
Washington has not been helpful in this regard. Its myopic and increasingly dissonant message of more trade and war on drugs and terrorists offers no answers to the bread-and-butter issues Latin America’s new leaders face. And America’s brand of economic liberalization has failed to motivate Latin elites to invest in their countries.
What should the United States do now?
For all his bluster, President Hugo Chavez exports 50 percent of his oil to U.S. markets, generating over $30 billion a year in revenue for Venezuela at today’s high prices. In Colombia, the United States spends hundreds of millions of dollars to protect an oil pipeline from Colombian rebel attacks.
Morales may grant concessions to China’s state energy company, and Brazil’s Petrobras and Spain’s Repsol already have investments in Bolivia.
But it is not too late for the United States to participate, preferably through the Inter-American Development Bank or the Organization of American States, in a broadly inclusive “blue skies” dialogue on how Latin America can use its energy resources to finance social development and to provide the United States with an alternative to its Middle East suppliers.
Morales and Chavez would no doubt balk at any U.S. initiative that smells of resource exploitation. And U.S. credibility may be far too damaged to engage with the region’s new leaders on such a sensitive issue.
Yet while geography may no longer be political destiny, it most certainly makes for cheaper transportation costs. The calculus of proximity may prevail over ideology.
But only if the Bush administration can, without the usual lectures, take the first step and demonstrate to the new governments and their constituents the U.S. commitment to democracy in the neighborhood.
It can start by acknowledging the gravity of the social challenges that explain the electoral victories of the left.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
