home > by publication type > daily analysis > Flexing Softly on Iran
Email
| Prepared by: | CFR.org Staff |
|---|
A surge in satellite TV broadcasts is at the core of new U.S. public-diplomacy efforts.
The end of the Cold War brought drastic reductions in U.S. funding for public-diplomacy programs, especially foreign-language broadcasts, bolstered by a sense in some policy circles that a long, great struggle had ended. The September 11, 2001, attacks showed the shortsightedness of such thinking. The Bush administration has recently re-emphasized the importance of public diplomacy in waging its “war on terrorism,” picking a former top presidential aide to head the State Department’s programs and boosting international broadcasting—including satellite television—with hundreds of millions of dollars.
The latest move in this direction is the administration’s request for $85 million for democracy-promoting efforts in Iran, a majority of it centered on Farsi-language broadcasts.
As Lionel Beehner explains in this CFR Background Q&A, the White House's move signals a change in approach by an administration that had focused on isolating Iran and labeled it part of the so-called axis of evil. It marks a new attempt to reform the Iranian regime from within through a tool known as “soft power.” One of the leading proponents of this approach, Joseph Nye of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, wrote in this Foreign Affairs article in 2004 that Washington’s success in the war on terrorism depends on its use of soft power—the capacity to persuade others without force.
Some in Congress applauded an attempt at reaching out to Iranians, though at least one nonproliferation expert was skeptical about the impact of increased broadcasts on the regime in Tehran (LAT). U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, in a speech at CFR calling for a new communications strategy across the government, said Rice's proposal on Iran was an "excellent start." Toppling the Iranian regime will be difficult with no Lech Walesa-like figure to lead a peaceful revolution, the Christian Science Monitor writes. But the paper says the high number of votes reform candidates received in last year's presidential election is a hopeful sign.
Administration officials have stressed broadcasting and educational exchanges but have not provided specifics about how the money would be delivered. Analysts such as Michael McFaul and Abbas Milani of the Hoover Institution have said developing democracy in Iran is the best long-term chance of ending a nuclear-weapons program there. But they have written that in the quarter-century since the Islamic revolution, U.S. administrations have failed to develop a strategy for advancing the cause of Iranian democracy. A 2004 CFR Task Force called on the Bush administration to “selectively engage” Iranian political leaders as well as to open ties between Americans and Iranians to overcome the official enmity that has festered since 1979.
To date, the major U.S. public-diplomacy initiative directed at Iran is Radio Farda, a twenty-four-hour news and music station jointly run by Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Surveys commissioned by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) show the Farsi-language Radio Farda is the most-listened to international broadcaster in Iran. Mehdi Khalaji, a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, says Farda has the potential to make a substantial impact in Iran. But he says a major overhaul is needed in its management to make Farda more effective.
The BBG announced earlier this month plans to shift more of VOA’s resources to broadcasts in the Middle East, including more television programming in Farsi and improvements to the Radio Farda web site (WashPost).
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.