home > by publication type > daily analysis > UAE Port Purchase Raises Outcry
Email
| Prepared by: | cfr.org editorial staff |
|---|
Despite a Coast Guard presence, U.S. ports remain vulnerable (Photo: AP)
Every year, some nine million cargo containers enter the United States through its ports. Soon after the September 11, 2001, attacks, calls arose to increase the scrutiny of this rapid flow of goods. These calls, says CFR fellow Stephen Flynn, have gone largely unanswered, leaving U.S. port security akin to "a house of cards."
This precarious situation has been highlighted again by the acquisition by Dubai Ports World—a major United Arab Emirates-based shipping and cargo concern—of the British firm that has been running portions of six major U.S. ports (BaltSun). The acquisition, described by cfr.org's Eben Kaplan in this Background Q&A, means significant portions of the ports of New York, Miami, Newark-Port Elizabeth, Philadelphia, New Orleans, and Baltimore would be run by Dubai Ports World. President Bush, who has defended the deal (VOA), is under pressure to reverse himself (CNN). State and local governments, Republican and Democrat, are up in arms. The Republican governors of New York and Maryland threaten legal action to block the deal (AP). Democratic senators from New Jersey and New York are drafting legislation prohibiting the sale (WNYC) of port operations to foreign governments. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) is making similar demands (Newsday).
The United Arab Emirates is considered a U.S. ally. However, as this CFR Task Force report made clear in 2004, the UAE was used as a financial and operational base by some of the 9/11 hijackers. That fact has many asking questions. The New York Times says the move takes the Bush administration's "laxness to a new level," while Newsday applauds legislators' efforts to review the ports deal.
But there are those—like Senator John McCain (R-AZ)—who urge caution before rushing to block the Dubai Ports World acquisition. According to the Wall Street Journal, the idea that Washington is outsourcing port security to hostile Arab governments "is alarmist nonsense." The Washington Post adds that none of the current furor reflects the extensive review process the ports sale underwent and criticizes Congress for spreading "prejudice and misinformation."
The uproar over the Dubai Ports World purchase is only the latest to focus on foreign ownership of vital infrastructure. The U.S. Congress last year overwhelmingly recommended against the Bush administration granting permission for a Chinese company, CNOOC, to purchase Unocal (Washington Quarterly), a U.S. oil services company. In 1999, just before Hutchison Whampoa, a Chinese company, took control of the shipping yards that line Panama Canal, retired U.S. admiral and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Thomas H. Moorer warned of a "nuclear Pearl Harbor" (NewsMax.com).
In fact, the vast majority of U.S. ports are owned by foreign companies. But ownership ranks toward the bottom of the vulnerabilities, says Flynn, who hopes the attention garnered by the recent purchase will emphasize the need to work with foreign entities in addressing larger security concerns. Regardless of who owns the ports, the volume of goods flowing through them is so massive that providing security oversight for incoming containers is a daunting task. After 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security created the "Container Security Initiative," but an April 2005 Government Accountability Office report (PDF) questions the program's ability to improve cargo security.
Incoming containers are not the only security concern in U.S. ports. Shipments of liquefied natural gas (LNG)—which is increasingly important to meet U.S. energy needs—also pose a risk, and many new terminals are on the drawing board, as cfr.org's Eben Kaplan explains in this CFR Background Q&A. The Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management as well as the Congressional Research Service (PDF) both offer solid overviews of the issue.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.