Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > New Attacks Revive Civil War Fears
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Shiite protesters in Baghdad after the Samarra bombing (Photo: AP)
Resurgent violence continues to shake Iraq and revive fears that sectarian fighting will doom the country's painstaking political reform process. The latest incidents, following a brief daytime curfew, have left dozens dead in Baghdad (NYT). The recent surge in sectarian fighting, in which hundreds have died in the past week, has forced a debate inside the Pentagon (LAT) about whether the U.S. military can proceed with their plans to pull back troop levels from Iraq later this year—a possibility contingent on political progress and the training of new Iraq security forces. CFR Senior Fellow Max Boot, just back from Iraq, writes in the Los Angeles Times "the picture becomes blurrier, the future murkier when you spend time in Iraq."
A new Zogby poll shows a majority of U.S. troops favor a withdrawal from Iraq within the next year. Meanwhile, former State Department intelligence analyst Wayne White tells cfr.org's Bernard Gwertzman that U.S. forces should withdraw in the next two years. “If things haven’t shaped up at that point, there’s not much we’re going to be able to do," he says. Writing in Foreign Affairs, CFR Senior Fellow Stephen Biddle says turning over internal security responsibilities to an Iraqi army comprised of homogenous religious units will only "throw gasoline on the fire."
Iraqis have suffered through days of reprisal killings and strikes against Sunni mosques after last week’s bombing of the revered Shiite Golden Mosque in Samarra. U.S. Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte, in February 28 testimony before the Senate, warned of the "possibility" of a civil war drawing in Saudi Arabia and Iran into the conflict (BaltSun). President Bush decried the latest round of violence and said the perpetrators wanted to “destroy in order to create chaos” and that Iraqis must choose between “chaos or unity.” The attack on the Golden Mosque, one of the holiest sites in Shiite Islam, has “pushed Iraq to the brink of war,” writes the Heritage Foundation's James Phillips, and damaged efforts to build a stable democracy. A new report by the International Crisis Group says this past year was the year “Iraq’s latent sectarianism took wings” and concludes a fully inclusive process is the “sine qua non for stabilization.” Four experts shed light on sectarian violence in TIME, including CFR's Noah Feldman and Vali Nasr. This CFR transcript and this GlobalSecurity.org backgrounder explain the history of Shiite-Sunni relations in Iraq.
The violence has also taken a serious toll on the already difficult political process of forming a national-unity government, outlined in this CFR Background Q&A. W. Patrick Lang, former head of Middle East Affairs and Counterterrorism at the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, disagrees, telling cfr.org's Lionel Beehner he doubts the shrine attack will scuttle Iraq's political process. Still, it's becoming clear militia groups such as Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army will continue to threaten Iraqi security, experts say. Sadr’s militia is one of many Shiite militant groups allegedly supported by Iran, which Washington has accused of seeking to destabilize Iraq. Cfr.org examines the links between Iran and Iraq in this CFR Background Q&A. Kenneth Pollack, a Brookings expert on the Persian Gulf region, tells cfr.org that militias, not the insurgency, are the “principal threat for civil war in Iraq.” And keeping militias out of Iraq's security forces will be crucial to ensuring future stability, says Matthew Sherman, former director of policy to Iraq’s Ministry of Interior, in an interview with cfr.org.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
