Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
home > by publication type > daily analysis > U.S. Sees Wrongs in Rights Panel
Email
| Author: |
|---|
Kofi Annan has made rights reform a priority (Photo: AP)
The UN Commission on Human Rights, formed in response to the horrors of World War II, is credited with establishing the world's core human rights treaties. But the commission will likely hold its last session this month under a cloud as the most maligned body in the organization. What will replace it remains a matter of debate. The new body proposed on February 23 by UN General Assembly President Jan Eliasson, the UN Human Rights Council, is already coming under criticism in the United States for having soft membership criteria.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan last year urged UN members to replace the commission with a permanent body chosen by at least two-thirds of the General Assembly's members. This was intended to prevent the repressive governments voted onto the rights panel from banding together to block scrutiny of their records. The U.S. congressional task force on UN reform headed by George Mitchell and Newt Gingrich last year adopted Annan's proposal nearly in whole, a sign of crucial support in Washington. This CFR Background Q&A looks at the relevance of the commission and why it is being abolished.
But the proposal emerging from months of difficult negotiations by UN members rolled back some of the rigorous membership requirements. Membership would be subject to a simple majority vote of the General Assembly. Unlike before, states on the council would undergo periodic review of their human rights records, an improvement on the commission membership process. But U.S. officials say this still provides few assurances that rogue states can be kept off the world's leading rights panel (VOA). They have called for a re-negotiation of the council's terms, delaying a vote on the Council.
Echoing the Bush administration, the New York Times calls the proposal a "pathetic draft" that would do little to improve UN action on rights issues. But Annan, a dozen Nobel laureates, and watchdog groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch say the new council, however imperfect, deserves U.S. support. Former President Jimmy Carter, speaking Thursday at CFR in New York, conceded the shortfalls of the reforms but lambasted Bush administration for suverting the process. "My hope is that when the vote is taken the other members will outvote the United States," he said.
Some have raised the issue of whether the United Nations is capable of reaching an agreement on meaningful human rights reforms. Rights expert Joseph Loconte, writing in National Review, says the latest round of debate over reforming the rights commission was undermined by what he called "the ethic of multiculturalism," which holds that no nation's political culture can be judged better or worse than any other's. Pakistan's ambassador Munir Akram, whose country had opposed any tough criteria for membership in the council, told the Washington Post there was a "civilizational" difference between the way he and Western negotiators viewed the problem.
The debate shows the distance the world has come since the near unanimous passage of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
