PrintPrint CiteCite
Style: MLAAPAChicago Close


R. Milhous Giuliani

A Front-Runner's Political Baggage

Author: Michael J. Gerson, Roger Hertog Senior Fellow
July 18, 2007
Washington Post


With the same rootless confidence that causes people to ignore hurricane warnings, many social conservatives remain in denial about Rudy Giuliani’s chances of winning the Republican nomination.

But with three debates and eight months as the Republican front-runner under his belt, Giuliani’s political strength cannot be dismissed as a fad or a fluke. His skills as a campaigner are considerable. His political strategy is plausible: Play down Iowa and New Hampshire, win Florida on Jan. 29, and sweep the big states (New York, California, Illinois) on Feb. 5, securing the nomination before a social-conservative reaction can set in. The Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney camps have their own victory scenarios, but they are not more likely.

So it is not too early for Republicans to consider some consequences of a Giuliani nomination.

To begin with, the ideological shift would be greater than meets the eye. Giuliani plays up his continuity with the Republican past, particularly with Ronald Reagan. But Reagan, of course, was a committed social conservative who expressed reservations about choosing George H.W. Bush as his running mate because of his questionable pro-life views. Giuliani’s style and approach are actually much closer to those of another politically successful Republican president: Richard Nixon, pre-Watergate.

In his elections, Nixon appealed to conservatives and the country as a culture warrior who was not a moral or religious conservative. “Permissiveness,” he told key aides, “is the key theme,” and Nixon pressed that theme against hippie protesters, tenured radicals and liberals who bad-mouthed America.

View full text of article.

More on This Topic


Callous Conservative

Author: Michael J. Gerson
Washington Post

Michael Gerson questions Fred Thompson’s moral seriousness.


Born Again

Author: Walter Russell Mead

Walter Russell Mead discusses how America’s evangelicals are growing more moderate—and more powerful.