Print
Email
Share
CiteWhat is preventing international action in Syria?
Asked by Jake C., from University of Texas at TylerA number of countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Turkey, and Qatar, have been providing support to the opposition in...
Speaker: Matthew C. Waxman, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Law and Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations
August 29, 2013
The United States has been considering military strikes against Syrian government targets in response to what it says is strong evidence that the regime used chemical weapons. However, such strikes will face tough questions about their legality, says CFR's Matthew Waxman. He offers three things to know about how international law applies to this situation.
Legal Grounds: Without a UN Security Council resolution authorizing "universally agreed-upon" force, or a claim of self-defense, a state would not have the legal grounds necessary to intervene in Syria, says Waxman. The United States and its partners do not have a resolution or a strong self-defense argument, according to Waxman. Although the United States could make an argument that chemical weapons pose a threat to the region, "they're really defending the Syrian people in an internal civil war," he says.
Precedent: Despite treaties outlawing chemical weapons use, there is no precedent for using military intervention as a response to violations, Waxman argues. Although the United States and its allies have a strong interest in deterring the use of chemical weapons, any military intervention would "really be stretching existing law," says Waxman.
Extraordinary Circumstances: If there is no legal basis for military intervention in Syria, any use of external force on Syrian government targets could be justified "as necessary to avert a humanitarian catastrophe," Waxman says. States are more accepting of intervention in extreme circumstances and when all diplomatic options have been exhausted, he argues.
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedInWill the Obama administration show a greater interest in Africa in the second term?
The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces
Special operations play a critical role in how the United States confronts irregular threats, but to have long-term strategic impact, the author argues, numerous shortfalls must be addressed.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
The biggest threat to America's security and prosperity comes not from abroad but from within, writes CFR President Richard N. Haass in his provocative new book. More
October 31 Application Deadline:
International Affairs Fellowship (IAF)
IAF in Japan
December 16 Application Deadline:
Stanton Nuclear Security Fellowship
January 17 Application Deadline:
IAF in Nuclear Security
March 1 Application Deadline:
Edward R. Murrow Press Fellowship
For application instructions and more information, visit www.cfr.org/fellowships.
A number of countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Turkey, and Qatar, have been providing support to the opposition in...
As fighting continues in Libya between anti- and pro-government forces, the Obama administration has warned that it is considering all...
The Obama administration's strongest case for intervening in Syria rests on the global security risks posed by the regime's suspected use of...
A reported devastating chemical weapons attack stirs new debate in Washington and global capitals about intervention in Syria. This Issue...