This is the 1st issue of the Center for Preventive Action Newsletter, which will provide periodic updates of recent CPA publications, events, and other activities. Our recent efforts include Contingency Planning Meetings and Memoranda that help the policy community anticipate and prepare for potential crises, a multi-part series of studies to enhance U.S. preventive action, and a forthcoming Council Special Report titled "Somalia: A New Approach." We are also updating our website to make it more of a resource for practitioners of preventive action. I hope that you find this newsletter useful, and will continue to take advantage of our various products.
Director, Center for Preventive Action
by Daniel Markey
India faces the real prospect of another major terrorist attack by Pakistan-based terrorist organizations in the near future, an event that would jeopardize important U.S. security interests in South Asia. This Contingency Planning Memorandum examines the factors that would condition India’s response; the consequences of Indian military retaliation and Pakistani counterretaliation for the United States; and Washington’s policy options for preventing and containing the crisis. Markey argues that U.S. efforts to prevent an Indo-Pakistani crisis should combine a range of counterterror tactics with measures that increase Washington’s ability to limit escalation by either side.
by Paul Stares & Micah Zenko
In this Council Special Report, Paul Stares and Micah Zenko assess in detail current U.S. practices with regard to different types of preventive action, examining such topics as intelligence community analyses; “watchlists” of states at risk; interagency planning processes; foreign assistance programming; and the work of the State Department office created in 2004 to lead U.S. government efforts in this area. The report cites an array of shortcomings in how the government plans and conducts its preventive activities, a situation that can leave policymakers scrambling to respond to crises after they break out. To improve this, the authors recommend revising and strengthening the strategic planning process under the leadership of the National Security Council, improving and consolidating intelligence products and connecting them more closely to policymakers, and providing additional funding for preventive efforts.
by Steven Simon
This Contingency Planning Memorandum assesses the likelihood of an Israeli strike on Iran, the policy options available to diminish that likelihood, the implications should it take place, and measures that can be taken to mitigate the consequences should it occur. The memo concludes that Israel is not eager to start a war with Iran, or disrupt its relations with the United States, but it will act if it perceives an imminent existential threat in the form of a nuclear Iran. Thus, American arguments for restraint must be backed by concrete measures to contain the perceived threat and affirmations of the special relationship.
In December 2009, the CPA polled CFR Fellows and other experts on what they thought the most pressing conflict prevention priorities will be in 2010. Read the survey results to find out which countries topped the list.
At a UN Roundtable on December 16, 2009, the permanent representatives of three outgoing non-permanent members of the UN Security Council met to discuss their experiences and lessons learned at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Pictured Here (L to R): Micah Zenko; Ambassador Ranko Vilovic, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Croatia to the UN; Ambassador Jorge Urbina, Permanent Representative of Costa Rica to the UN; Ambassador Le Luong Minh, Permanent Representative of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam to the UN
For more conflict prevention analysis, visit CFR's Center for Preventive Action.
In this CSR, coauthored by Paul B. Stares and Micah Zenko sponsored by the Center for Preventive Action, evaluates the U.S. system for foreseeing and heading off crises and assesses in detail current U.S. practices with regard to different types of preventive action. More
This report, authored by Bronwyn E. Bruton and sponsored by the Center for Preventive Action, argues that the current U.S. policy of supporting the TFG is unlikely to succeed and ineffective foreign meddling threatens to prolong and worsen the conflict. Instead, the United States should pursue a strategy of "constructive disengagement" while still maintaining support for localized development initiatives and humanitarian assistance. More
For more information on the CPA, contact: