Research Projects

Below you will find a chronological list of research projects in the Studies Program. You can search by issue or region by selecting the appropriate category. In addition to this sorting control, you can search for specific subjects within the alphabetical, regional, and issue categories by choosing from the selections in the drop-down menu below.

Each project page contains the name of the project director, a description of the project, a list of meetings it has held, and any related publications, transcripts, or videos.

Business and Foreign Policy

Roundtable on Technology, Innovation, and American Primacy

Director: James P. Dougherty, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Business and Foreign Policy
January 1, 2004—Present

America's ability to encourage innovative ideas has helped to establish it as the world's economic and military leader. However, technological developments over the past thirty years have spawned an increasingly globalized world and created new challenges to American pre-eminence. This roundtable series investigates how the government's response to these challenges will affect America's global economic and political standing.

Roundtable on Business and Transatlantic Relations

Staff: David Braunschvig, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Business and Foreign Policy
January 1, 2003—Present

This roundtable series explores current issues at the intersection of U.S. foreign policy and private sector activity. Meetings in the past have focused on the possible effects of anti-Americanism in Europe on U.S. brands, the negotiations between the European Union and the United States over genetically modified foods, and the impact of the European Union's satellite navigation system (Galileo) on U.S. strategic interests. The aim of the series is to inform the current debate on those policies important to both corporate executives and government officials, and to provide them with constructive and thoughtful recommendations.

High-Level Roundtable Series on American Competitiveness

Director: Benn Steil, Senior Fellow and Director of International Economics
March 1, 2005—April 1, 2006

Made possible by the generosity of Bernard L. Schwartz, this roundtable series explores issues that affect the competitiveness of the U.S. economy. Meetings have addressed issues such as the sustainability of the U.S. current account deficit, the effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement process, and intellectual property rights.

Study Group on Financial Statecraft: The Role of Financial Markets in American Foreign Policy

Chair: Jeffrey R. Shafer
Director: Benn Steil, Senior Fellow and Director of International Economics
January 1, 2003—September 1, 2004

Financial markets, institutions, and instruments are playing an increasing role in American foreign policy, both as servants of traditional foreign policy aims, such as national security, and as objects, in their own right, of foreign trade and market access negotiations. Tensions and contradictions abound in this formulation, and are apparent in fierce policy debates over the merits of IMF bailouts, dollarization, financial sanctions, and market access restrictions. The project director is writing a book that examines the growing role of finance in foreign policy, why it is important, where its effects are misunderstood, and how institutional reforms can help in managing incompatible goals. Sessions of this study group will provide feedback on draft chapters.

Economic Development

Study Group on Promoting Political and Economic Reform in the Middle East

Chair: Lisa Anderson, Columbia University
Staff: Steven A. Cook, Hasib J. Sabbagh Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
July 1, 2004—January 1, 2006

This Study Group is organized around chapters of Steven Cook’s recently completed book manuscript titled: Ruling, But Not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Turkey, and Algeria. Historically, Egypt, Turkey, and Algeria have exhibited a fairly predictable and similar set of political patterns which reflected the stability of authoritarian politics in these countries. In late 1990s and early 21st century, Turkey was able to break the political logjam of authoritarianism. What accounts for regime stability in Egypt, Algeria, and previously Turkey? Why was Turkey successful and Egypt and Algeria not successful? This book is intended to combine a scholarly approach to interesting questions concerning regime stability, Islamist political activity, civil-military relations, and transitions to and from democracy; yet it also contains a conscious policy edge that is relevant to current debates about democracy in the Arab and wider Muslim world.

The Study Group is made possible by the generous support from the Kauffman Foundation.

Study Group on Chinese Economic Development and U.S. National Security

Chair: Kenneth Lieberthal
Staff: Adam Segal, Maurice R. Greenberg Senior Fellow for China Studies
January 1, 2003—June 30, 2004
This study group drew attention to the unraveling of the bipartisan consensus that Chinese economic development is good for U.S. security; provided a framework for assessing what security benefits and risks the United States can expect from its future economic relations with China; and described what the end of this consensus means for U.S. policy toward China, and Asia in general. With the resulting analysis the project director wrote a policy article, which provided brief descriptions of the security benefits that Chinese economic growth was expected to bring to the United States, outlined the security critique of U.S.-China economic relations, and addressed the integration and interaction of economic and security issues in the Sino-U.S. relationship.

International Finance

CGS Seminar Series in International Finance

Staff: Peter B. Kenen, Adjunct Senior Fellow for International Economics
December 1, 2004—Present

This roundtable series examines the prospects for regional monetary integration and other developments likely to affect the organization and functioning of the international monetary system.

Study Group on Financial Statecraft: The Role of Financial Markets in American Foreign Policy

Chair: Jeffrey R. Shafer
Director: Benn Steil, Senior Fellow and Director of International Economics
January 1, 2003—September 1, 2004

Financial markets, institutions, and instruments are playing an increasing role in American foreign policy, both as servants of traditional foreign policy aims, such as national security, and as objects, in their own right, of foreign trade and market access negotiations. Tensions and contradictions abound in this formulation, and are apparent in fierce policy debates over the merits of IMF bailouts, dollarization, financial sanctions, and market access restrictions. The project director is writing a book that examines the growing role of finance in foreign policy, why it is important, where its effects are misunderstood, and how institutional reforms can help in managing incompatible goals. Sessions of this study group will provide feedback on draft chapters.

Labor

Borders Beyond Control

January 1, 2005—Present

In this book, the author analyzes how the U.S. ought to manage immigration, taking into account politics, sociology, economics, and international relations. He calls for a benign attitude toward illegal immigration, a policy stance he supports even in the wake of September 11.

Expected publication date: Spring 2006

Energy/Environment

Study Group on Trade, Science and Genetically Modified Foods

Director: Carlisle Ford Runge
Chair: David L. Aaron, under Secretary for International Trade, U.S. Department of Commerce
Staff: David G. Victor, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
March 1, 2001—June 1, 2002
Contact: Jeremy Marwell 212.434.9615 / jmarwell@cfr.org

Study Group on Global Warming Technology Policy for the United States

Chair: Rodney W. Nichols, President and CEO Emeritus, New York Academy of Sciences
Staff: David G. Victor, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
April 1, 1999—June 1, 2000
With U.S. industry accounting for one-fifth of annual global emissions of carbon dioxide—the leading cause of global warming—this study group explores U.S. policies that directly target the development and deployment of less carbon-intensive energy technologies. Since cutting emissions will require massive technological change toward clean, carbon-free fuels, the group sets its sights on long-term technological solutions for the United States and other industrial countries as well as for the developing world. The end product will be a book by David Victor on U.S. policy options.

Study Group on the Great Restoration: Protecting the World’s Forests to 2050

Chairs: Jesse H. Ausubel, and John Spears
Staff: David G. Victor, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
January 1, 1999—June 1, 2000
Despite widespread concern about the world’s dwindling forestland, major international efforts to protect forests have not been very effective. This project identifies the technical potential for protecting forests around the world over the next half century. It focuses on the role of high-yield forests, such as plantations, which make it possible to shrink the area of forests that are used for supplying timber to world markets, leaving the rest of forests for other purposes such as protection of biological diversity and watersheds. Already there is evidence that this shift is under way—in all temperate and boreal forests, a "restoration" is occurring as forests expand into abandoned croplands and foresters find ways to increase the yield they squeeze from production forests. The project is exploring the technical and political obstacles to accelerating this restoration. Products include a major article on effective long-term strategies for forest protection, as well as numerous technical papers on the project website (see link below). The project has led to follow-up efforts at the Food and Agriculture Organization and at the Liu Center (University of British Columbia), and the "vision" for future forests developed by the project is now being used in regional forestry planning meetings and in planning efforts by business and environmental groups.

W. Averell Harriman Transatlantic Economic Agenda Project

Director: Bruce Stokes
October 1, 1996—June 1, 1998
This project has created a research network of international affairs think tanks on both sides of the Atlantic to: (1) assess the implications of deepening and widening the transatlantic economic relationship, especially its impact on key sectors of the economy, other countries, and the global trading system; and (2) widen the circle of economists and policy analysts engaged in such an assessment to ensure that a diversity of views informs government deliberations on this subject. On June 22-23, 1998, the Council and the Royal Institute of International Affairs cosponsored a conference in London, "Cyberbusiness: European and U.S. Perspectives on the Coming Revolution in Electronic Commerce."

Bertelsmann Project on Transatlantic Relations

Staff: Charles A. Kupchan, Whitney Shepardson Senior Fellow
November 1, 1993—October 1, 1996
In its fourth and final year, the Bertelsmann project focused on civic society in the Atlantic Community. Among the questions addressed were: Do Americans and Europeans share similar notions of civic engagement? Does civic activity take different forms on each side of the Atlantic? Does civic engagement exist at the transnational level--either within Europe or across the Atlantic? Prominent Americans and Europeans were commissioned to address these questions. The final product, and edited volume, will be published in 1997.

W. Averell Harriman Study Group on Transatlantic Relations

Staff: Charles A. Kupchan, Whitney Shepardson Senior Fellow
April 1, 1996—September 1, 1996
This group gathered scholars from both sides of the Atlantic to think more broadly about the future of U.S. -European relations. Questions addressed included: What is the likely trajectory of trade and monetary relations between the United States and Europe? How are migration pressures and labor market organizations likely to affect transatlantic economic relations? How have U.S.-European security relations changed in terms of bother international structure and domestic politics? How do American and European views of America's future role in Europe differ? How are the EU's ongoing and planned institutional transformations likely to affect political and economic relations inside Europe? Are changes in identity among Europeans keeping pace with the evolution of the EU? The study group produced three volumes in 1998: Transatlantic Economic Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, edited by Barry Eichengreen; Atlantic Security, edited by Charles Kupchan, and Centralization or Fragmentation: Europe Facing the Challenges of Deepening, Diversity, and Democracy, edited by Andrew Moravcsik. Charles Kupchan and Roger Altman also co-authored an article examining the effects of Asia's ascendance on Atlantic relations.

Natural Resources Management

Study Group on Russian Gas and the American Interest

Staff: David G. Victor, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
January 1, 2005—Present

This study group examines Russia's considerable influence in international gas markets and proposes strategies that the United States might pursue to either reform or out-manuever Russia's dominant gas supplier, Gazprom. Particular attention will be paid to the role of liquified natural gas (LNG) in the gas markets of future, as well as the role of domestic power consumption, regulation, and conservation in determining future demand.

The findings from this study will help Dr. Victor write a scholarly article to be placed in a major foreign policy journal.

Indonesia Commission: Peace and Progress in Papua

Director: David L. Phillips, Executive Director, The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity
Chair: Dennis C. Blair, Former Commander-in-Chief of the Pacific Command
August 1, 2002—May 1, 2003
There is only one way to avoid further conflict in the remote and impoverished, yet resource-rich, Indonesian province of Papua: Give it greater self-governance and a stake in the development of its vast natural wealth. Failure to prevent conflict in Papua would likely cause a spiral of deadly violence destabilizing Indonesia. This is the central conclusion of the Council’s Indonesia Commission: Peace and Progress in Papua. Chaired by Admiral Dennis C. Blair, former Commander-in-Chief of the United States Pacific Command, the Commission recommends concrete steps international stakeholders can take to encourage full and effective implementation of the Special Autonomy Law, which promises substantial portions of the province’s wealth to Papuans. Enacted by the Indonesian authorities, it was never put into force. The Commission argues that power-sharing represents a win-win situation: Special Autonomy preserves Indonesia’s territorial integrity while advancing the needs of Papuans. The report also identifies a pro-active role for the international community via new mechanisms for donor and policy coordination.

Global Governance

Study Group on New World Order

Director: Michael Mandelbaum, Christian Herter Professor, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins University
July 1, 2000—June 30, 2004

The activities carried out under this study group during previous years have supported the development of the project director’s recently published book, The Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy, and Free Markets in the Twenty-first Century. Throughout the Fall, the project director will promote his by holding Council meetings in New York, Washington, and across the country. Following this book promotion, the project director will begin research on a new book, building on the first, related to America’s role in the world.