Generation Sequestration: A Call to Action
Kathryn Salucka analyzes the impact sequestration could have on the American people, and encourages voters to become more active in demanding...
Speaker: Stewart M. Patrick, Senior Fellow and Director of the International Institutions and Global Governance Program, Council on Foreign Relations
March 15, 2012
Navigating the United States' "tricky" and "ambivalent" relationship with the United Nations will be one of the biggest foreign policy challenges for the winner of the 2012 presidential election, says CFR's Stewart M. Patrick.
The U.S. president will continue to rely on the UN to accomplish goals the United States can't achieve on its own, to share the burdens that might otherwise fall entirely on the United States, and to win legitimacy for U.S. efforts, Patrick argues.
Patrick identifies several major challenges that the president will face in dealing with the UN, including ensuring Security Council attention to Iran's nuclear program, bolstering UN peacekeeping, transforming the Human Rights Council, furthering global development, and reforming the UN's management and budget.
"The United States must take a more vigorous stance on the expansion of the UN Security Council by advocating a modest enlargement of the permanent membership based on transparent criteria," he says. "Making this change is essential if the Council is to have the political support and power it needs to defend peace and security in the twenty-first century."
This video is part of Campaign 2012, a series of video briefings on the top foreign policy issues debated in the run-up to the 2012 elections.
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
What effect would the fall of the Assad regime have on U.S. policy towards Syria?
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
The biggest threat to America's security and prosperity comes not from abroad but from within, writes CFR President Richard N. Haass in his provocative and important new book. More
Capitalism and Inequality: Why both the left and right get it wrong
General Stanley McChrystal on the U.S. war on terror
The U.S.-Pakistan alliance: Why it should end
subscribe nowPublished by the Council on Foreign Relations since 1922
Kathryn Salucka analyzes the impact sequestration could have on the American people, and encourages voters to become more active in demanding...
Stewart M. Patrick and Emma Welch assess the debate over an international conventional arms trade treaty and find that U.S. domestic...
The UN Human Rights Council is emerging as an increasingly relevant player in the Syrian crisis. CFR's Stewart M. Patrick highlights five...
The Russian and Chinese veto of a UN Security Council resolution calling for an end to violence in Syria calls into question the viability of...