Must Read

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

CRS Report: Assasination Ban and E.O. 12333

January 4, 2002

Share

In the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the New York World
Trade Center and the Pentagon, some attention has been focused upon the assassination
ban contained in Executive Order (E.O.) 12333, Section 2.11, and whether it would
prohibit the United States from responding to the attacks by targeting those who
orchestrated these acts of terrorism. In considering the challenges involved in effectively
combating terrorism and protecting the United States from future terrorist attacks, there
has been wide-ranging debate as to what approaches might be beneficial. Part of that
discussion has centered around whether assassination of terrorist leaders is, or should be,
one of the options available. This report offers a summary discussion of the assassination
ban in E.O. 12333, its context, and possible interpretations of its scope.

Full Text of Document

More on This Topic

Op-Ed

Evolution, Not Revolution, at the FBI

Author: Charles E. Berger
National Interest Online

Charles Berger writes that the FBI has always been a national security agency that uses both its law enforcement and intelligence authorities...

Op-Ed

AUMF: Rewrite and Renew

Author: Charles E. Berger
National Interest Online

The 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force statute should be reframed and expanded to reflect the current counterterrorism...

Op-Ed

A Rehab Model for Gitmo Detainees

Author: Charles E. Berger
Los Angeles Times

The United States should establish a rehabilitation center in Yemen for repatriated Guantanamo Bay detainees, writes Charles Berger.

Op-Ed

The Futility of Terrorism

Author: Max Boot
Wall Street Journal

In light of the terrorist attack at the 2013 Boston Marathon, Max Boot writes, "Keep calm and carry on."