- Blog Post
- Blog posts represent the views of CFR fellows and staff and not those of CFR, which takes no institutional positions.
Here’s what I wrote the morning after the Cancun climate talks ended:
“There is one big hole in the Cancun agreement that many observers, in their excitement, appear to have quickly forgotten: its treatment of the Kyoto Protocol…. The Cancun result punts the dispute to next year’s talks…. The big challenge for next year’s talks will be to protect Cancun’s progress and momentum from the inevitable acrimony over Kyoto.”
And here’s the news from the first post-Cancun session of the talks, currently underway in Bangkok:
“Poorer nations upped the ante on rich countries at U.N. climate talks on Tuesday by demanding that the world’s main climate treaty be extended from 2013 and for industrialised countries to deepen carbon-cutting pledges…. [Tuvalu delegate Ian Fry] urged nations that did not support an extension of Kyoto to leave the room, triggering applause.”
Too many folks in the developed world, though, continue to ignore this reality in the hopes that it will go away. NRDC’s Jake Schmidt is a bellwhether: in his otherwise insightful curtainraiser for Bangkok, he describes the ideal agenda for this year’s UN talks. The word Kyoto doesn’t show up.
This is an increasingly untenable approach. Alas, I’m still at a loss for a solution. The United States, Japan, and Australia have made it emphatically clear that they will not participate in Kyoto II. European nations are of various stripes. Some developing countries are ideologically attached to Kyoto. Others might be more pragmatic in principle, but are boxed in by domestic politics. There is no way to finesse this on the substance.
The best we can hope for, I suspect, it to find a procedural approach that insulates Cancun’s gains from the impending Kyoto blowup. The first task is to make that clash as unsurprising as possible; Europeans could help with that by coming down more clearly against Kyoto II. This won’t make support for a new Kyoto commitment period melt away, but it may give developing countries and their publics more time to come to terms with the inevitable. The second task is to make the Cancun follow-on as substantive as possible: with more concrete progress on the line, states may be more hesitant to jettison it over a Kyoto fight. A third prong might involve public diplomacy, particularly in places like India, Brazil, and Indonesia.
But I’m far from confident that this will do the trick. When I started this blog a year ago yesterday, the Kyoto conundrum was the subject of my first post; I was equally despairing then as to a solution. Does anyone have any new ideas?