- Blog Post
- Blog posts represent the views of CFR fellows and staff and not those of CFR, which takes no institutional positions.
"Banking is the industry that failed. Banks are meant to allocate capital to businesses and consumers efficiently; instead, they ladled credit to anyone who wanted it. Banks are supposed to make money by skilfully managing the risk of transforming short-term debt into long-term loans; instead, they were undone by it. They are supposed to expedite the flow of credit through economies; instead, they ended up blocking it. The costs of this failure are massive. Frantic efforts by governments to save their financial systems and buoy their economies will do long-term damage to public finances. The IMF reckons that average government debt for the richer G20 countries will exceed 100% of GDP in 2014, up from 70% in 2000 and just 40% in 1980."
The Nation? Nope. The Economist. Andrew Palmer of the Economist to be precise.
Now that the IMF estimates that the losses from the last credit boom will be close to $4 trillion -- with two thirds of the losses coming from the world’s banks -- it is rather hard to argue with him.
Yet only two years ago, the financial system of the US -- and for that matter the UK -- were the envy of much of the world.
Securitization was thought to have protected the core of the financial system from the risks associated with the rup-up in home prices (see paragraph 5 on p. 8 of the IMF’s 2007 assessment of the US) China, as Peter Goodman reminds us, wanted to import Anglo-Saxon financial know-how to help strengthen its banks.
Some things haven’t changed over the past couple of years, but an awful lot has.