Separate polls out today by the New York Times/CBS News and the Wall Street Journal/NBC News show considerable public opposition to President Obama’s call for military strikes against Syria. Both polls show something else as well: Americans doubt the wisdom of U.S. activism overseas more broadly.
The Times/CBS News poll asked whether the United States should take the lead in solving foreign conflicts. Sixty-two percent of those surveyed said no; just 34 percent said yes.
The WSJ/NBC News poll asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with the statement: "America is doing too much in other countries around the world, and it is time to do less around the world and focus more on our own problems here at home." Nearly three-in-four Americans agreed.
These responses are clearly influenced by the current debate over Syria. When a WSJ/NBC News poll asked back in May whether the United States was "doing too much" overseas, just 54 percent said yes.
But the public’s skepticism of foreign policy activism is not just about Syria. The Afghanistan and Iraq wars and a financial crisis that exposed weaknesses in the U.S. economy had many Americans questioning the wisdom of international activism long before Syria’s chemical weapons came to dominate the headlines. When the Pew Research Center asked back in 2009 whether the United States should mind its own business internationally, 49 percent of those surveyed said yes. That was up seven percentage points from a 2005 Pew poll.
So the public’s skepticism about the benefits of an activist foreign policy is not a passing fad. To be sure, fading memories of Iraq and Afghanistan, robust economic growth, and events overseas could combine to restore the public’s appetite for global activism. But for now, most Americans look content to let others lead.