Conflict Prevention Priorities: Three Things to Know

December 19, 2012

Conflict Prevention Priorities: Three Things to Know
Explainer Video
from Video

Every year, CFR’s Center for Preventive Action surveys leading experts to rank conflict prevention priorities based on their potential impact on U.S. interests and their likelihood of occurring in the coming year. Paul B. Stares, General John W. Vessey Senior Fellow for Conflict Prevention and Director of the Center for Preventive Action at CFR highlights some of the top preventive priorities for the United States in 2013:

More From Our Experts
  • Syria’s Civil War – "The intensification of Syria’s civil war including possible limited external intervention was judged to have the highest priority," says Stares. The Syrian conflict was the only contingency that the survey found both likely to come to a head in the next year, and also likely to have substantial impact for U.S. interests.

More on:

Conflict Prevention

  • Iran’s Nuclear Standoff – An Israeli military strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities remains plausible in the coming year, according to the survey. "Such an attack could have a profound effect on stability in the region and embroil the United States in the conflict that would likely ensue if Iran chooses to retaliate," says Stares.

More on:

Conflict Prevention

  • East Asia Territorial Disputes – The survey found continued escalation of tensions in the South China Sea and East China Sea is yet another plausible contingency which would have significant implications for U.S. interests. "This applies in particular to a potential Sino-Japanese clash over the disputed islands in the East China Sea," says Stares, "if there is an armed clash, the United States would likely be drawn in because of its treaty obligations to Japan."

More on:

Conflict Prevention

More on:

Conflict Prevention

Close

Top Stories on CFR

Climate Change

Global

Link

Saudi Arabia

Relations between the two countries, long bound by common interests in oil and security, have strained over what some analysts see as a more assertive Saudi foreign policy.