{"id":63,"date":"2026-01-13T06:18:28","date_gmt":"2026-01-13T06:18:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cfrdevwp.wpenginepowered.com\/?p=63"},"modified":"2026-01-13T11:44:19","modified_gmt":"2026-01-13T11:44:19","slug":"deployment-of-combat-forces-to-vietnam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/deployment-of-combat-forces-to-vietnam\/","title":{"rendered":"Deployment of Combat Forces to Vietnam"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>On March 8, 1965, 3,500 Marines from the\u00a09th Marine Expeditionary Brigade\u00a0arrived in Da Nang, South Vietnam. Their mission was to protect a U.S. air base from attacks by the self-proclaimed National Liberation Front (NLF), the guerrilla force seeking to overthrow the South Vietnamese government that was better known to Americans by the pejorative name Viet Cong. Six days earlier, the United States had begun Operation Rolling Thunder, a bombing campaign against North Vietnam that would last for three years. Some U.S. officials opposed sending the Marines to Da Nang, predicting that President Lyndon B. Johnson would soon be pressed to send even more troops into a war that could not be easily won. Despite his own deep misgivings about the ability of the United States to win a\u00a0conflict he called \u201cthe worst mess I ever saw in my life,\u201d Johnson committed another 120,000 troops to South Vietnam over the next 5 months and more than a half million over the next three years. The war, however, remained unwinnable. SHAFR historians ranked the deployment of U.S. combat troops to Vietnam as the second-worst U.S. foreign policy decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On March 8, 1965, 3,500 Marines from the\u00a09th Marine Expeditionary Brigade\u00a0arrived in Da Nang, South Vietnam. Their mission was to protect a U.S. air base from attacks by the self-proclaimed National Liberation Front (NLF), the guerrilla force seeking to overthrow the South Vietnamese government that was better known to Americans by the pejorative name Viet [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2238,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-worst-decisions"],"acf":{"add_section":[{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"The Domino Theory","add_section_content":"A Communist-led insurgency led in 1954 to the end of French rule over Indochina and temporarily divided Vietnam into a Communist North and a non-Communist South. Fearing that if South Vietnam went communist the rest of Southeast Asia would follow\u2014a belief known as the \u201cdomino theory\u201d\u2014the Eisenhower administration pumped economic and military aid into South Vietnam to position it as a counterweight to North Vietnam. That support included sending seven hundred U.S. military advisers.\r\n\r\nIn 1959, North Vietnam launched an insurgency in South Vietnam fought by the NLF. By the time President John F. Kennedy took office two years later, the insurgency had grown, exposing the South Vietnamese government\u2019s weak popular support. Although Kennedy had argued years earlier that \u201cno amount of American military assistance in Indochina\u201d could defeat an insurgency that \u201chas the support and covert appeal of the people,\u201d he continued President Dwight D. Eisenhower\u2019s commitment to South Vietnam and for the same reason. By the time of Kennedy\u2019s assassination in November 1963, the U.S. presence in Vietnam had grown to sixteen thousand military advisors.","add_image":3333,"image_position":"right","background":true,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution","add_section_content":"South Vietnam was foundering when Johnson took office. The Kennedy administration had backed a coup against its deeply unpopular president, Ngo Dinh Diem. He was murdered in the coup, which was launched three weeks before Kennedy\u2019s death. Although Johnson opposed the coup, he kept Kennedy\u2019s national security team, most notably Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara. Johnson also doubled down on Kennedy\u2019s anti-insurgency efforts.\r\n\r\nVietnam posed a political problem for Johnson. He was running for president in 1964 against Republican Barry Goldwater, who blamed him for failing to stop the insurgency in Vietnam. In August, Johnson responded to what he said were unprovoked attacks against two U.S. destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin off the coast of Vietnam by ordering airstrikes against North Vietnam. He also convinced Congress to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized him \u201cto take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States\u201d not just in Vietnam but across Southeast Asia. Much of what the Johnson administration told members of Congress about the Gulf of Tonkin incident was untrue. Pledging to keep U.S. troops out of war in Vietnam, Johnson won the 1964 presidential election in a landslide.","add_image":"","image_position":"null","background":false,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"quote","add_section_title":"Escalation","add_section_content":"The pace of U.S. escalation ramped up on August 2, 1964, when two U.S. destroyers radioed that North Vietnamese gunboats in the Gulf of Tonkin had fired upon them. Then, on August 4, there were reports of a second attack. Despite questions about the viability of the second attack, Johnson was quick to claim both events as unprovoked acts of aggression against the U.S. He asked Congress for a joint resolution granting him the power to use \u201call necessary measures\u201d to respond accordingly.\r\n\r\nThe Gulf of Tonkin Resolution handed Johnson and his advisors a blank check to wage war in Vietnam how they saw fit. Over the next two years, the administration used that check to drastically speed up the timetable of U.S. escalation and extend the perimeters of the American commitment in South Vietnam. On February 13, 1965, Johnson approved Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy\u2019s policy recommendations for sustained air attacks on North Vietnam, otherwise known as Operation Rolling Thunder. From its official implementation on March 2, 1965, to its conclusion in November of 1968, Operation Rolling Thunder encapsulated the American military effort in Vietnam and its destructive environmental, infrastructural, and physiological impacts.","add_image":1256,"image_position":"right","background":true,"quote_content":"We are not about to send American boys 9 or 10,000 miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves.","quote_footer":"President Lyndon B. Johnson, October 21, 1964","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"Operation Rolling Thunder","add_section_content":"Johnson said nothing about Vietnam in his inaugural address. He focused instead on remaking domestic policy by enacting Great Society programs like Medicare and passing the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts. But Vietnam remained a pressing issue. In early February 1965, NLF attacks killed thirty-one Americans. Johnson consulted with Eisenhower and Harry S. Truman; both former presidents urged him to hit back hard. Others that Johnson spoke to, including Vice President Hubert Humphrey, argued against deepening U.S. involvement in Vietnam.\r\n\r\nWedded to the belief \u201cthat when you give, the dictators feed on raw meat,\u201d Johnson chose to escalate. Unwilling to invade North Vietnam because he feared triggering a war with China, Johnson quietly approved Operation Rolling Thunder, which sought to use a gradually intensifying bombing campaign against North Vietnam to boost South Vietnam\u2019s morale while coercing Hanoi into ending its support for the NLF. Johnson also agreed to send 3,500 Marines to Da Nang to protect the U.S. airbase from attack. He chose escalation even though he told McNamara privately, \u201cI don\u2019t see any way of winning.\u201d","add_image":3335,"image_position":"right","background":true,"quote_content":"The performance of commanders and crews in this engagement is in the highest tradition of the United States Navy. But repeated acts of violence against the Armed Forces of the United States must be met not only with alert defense, but with positive reply.","quote_footer":"President Johnson, August 4, 1964","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"quote","add_section_title":"","add_section_content":"","add_image":3324,"image_position":"bottom","background":false,"quote_content":"I guess we\u2019ve got no choice, but it scares the death out of me. I think everybody\u2019s going to think, \u2018we\u2019re landing the Marines, we\u2019re off to battle.\u2019","quote_footer":"President Lyndon B. Johnson, March 6, 1965","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"","add_section_content":"","add_image":3324,"image_position":"bottom","background":false,"quote_content":"I guess we\u2019ve got no choice, but it scares the death out of me. I think everybody\u2019s going to think, \u2018we\u2019re landing the Marines, we\u2019re off to battle.\u2019","quote_footer":"President Lyndon B. Johnson, March 6, 1965","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"Some Carrots, More Sticks","add_section_content":"In April 1965, Johnson offered North Vietnam carrots to go along with the stick of airstrikes. In a nationally broadcast speech at Johns Hopkins University, he offered to hold \u201cunconditional discussions\u201d with Hanoi and to invest $1 billion in Southeast Asia. A month later, he paused Operation Rolling Thunder for five days and privately offered to scale back U.S. attacks if North Vietnam eased its pressure on South Vietnam. Believing that battlefield trends were working in its favor and correctly suspecting that Johnson was looking to silence critics who said he was rushing into war rather than seeking serious negotiations, Hanoi dismissed both offers.\r\n\r\nMeanwhile, Johnson felt growing pressure to use more sticks. Maxwell Taylor, the U.S. ambassador to South Vietnam and a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had warned Johnson in February that once U.S. combat troops arrived, \u201cit will be very difficult to hold the line\u201d on requests for reinforcements. Events proved Taylor right. In early June, General William Westmoreland, the head of U.S. military forces in South Vietnam, told McNamara that he needed 150,000 more troops. Johnson had reached a turning point.","add_image":"","image_position":"null","background":false,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"Excerpts From President Lyndon B. Johnson\u2019s \u201cPeace Without Conquest\u201d Speech at Johns Hopkins University, April 7, 1965","video_link":"","youtube_link":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=vh_kHVYnUto"},{"quote_section":"videolink","add_section_title":"\u201cYou Either Get Out or Get In\u201d","add_section_content":"Johnson complained privately about the demands that U.S. military leaders were making, saying at one point that they are \u201cawfully irresponsible\u201d and \u201cready to put a million men in right quick.\u201d Some advisors urged Johnson to cut his losses. Undersecretary of State George Ball was the most vocal. He warned in early July that committing more troops to Vietnam meant \u201calmost certainly a protracted war involving an open-ended commitment of U.S. forces, mounting U.S. casualties, no assurance of a satisfactory solution, and a serious danger of escalation at the end of the road.\u201d\r\n\r\nMost of Johnson\u2019s advisors argued the opposite. General Earle Wheeler, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said \u201cno one ever won a battle sitting on his ass.\u201d McNamara visited Saigon in early July and returned to say that committing more troops would \u201cstave off defeat in the short run and offer a good chance of producing a favorable settlement in the longer run.\u201d Johnson understood the stakes. As he told Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield, \u201cit\u2019s shaping up like this\u2026 you either get out or you get in.\u201d\r\n\r\n<strong>President Lyndon B. Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on July 2, 1965<\/strong>\r\n<div class=\"text-content field field--name-field-body field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field__item\">\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-audio\"><audio src=\"https:\/\/assets.cfr.org\/video\/upload\/v1762455533\/Vietnam_yn2egd.wav \" controls=\"controls\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/audio><\/figure>\r\n<\/div>","add_image":3318,"image_position":"right","background":false,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"Excerpts From President Lyndon B. Johnson\u2019s Speech at Johns Hopkins University, April 7, 1965","video_link":"","youtube_link":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=vh_kHVYnUto"},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"\u201cYou Either Get Out or Get In\u201d","add_section_content":"Johnson complained privately about the demands that U.S. military leaders were making, saying at one point that they are \u201cawfully irresponsible\u201d and \u201cready to put a million men in right quick.\u201d Some advisors urged Johnson to cut his losses. Undersecretary of State George Ball was the most vocal. He warned in early July that committing more troops to Vietnam meant \u201calmost certainly a protracted war involving an open-ended commitment of U.S. forces, mounting U.S. casualties, no assurance of a satisfactory solution, and a serious danger of escalation at the end of the road.\u201d\r\n\r\nMost of Johnson\u2019s advisors argued the opposite. General Earle Wheeler, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said \u201cno one ever won a battle sitting on his ass.\u201d McNamara visited Saigon in early July and returned to say that committing more troops would \u201cstave off defeat in the short run and offer a good chance of producing a favorable settlement in the longer run.\u201d Johnson understood the stakes. As he told Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield, \u201cit\u2019s shaping up like this\u2026 you either get out or you get in.\u201d\r\n\r\n<strong>Phone Conversation Between President Lyndon B. Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on U.S. Options in Vietnam, July 2, 1965.<\/strong>\r\n<div class=\"text-content field field--name-field-body field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field__item\">\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-audio\"><audio src=\"https:\/\/assets.cfr.org\/video\/upload\/v1762455533\/Vietnam_yn2egd.wav \" controls=\"controls\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/audio><\/figure>\r\n<\/div>","add_image":3318,"image_position":"right","background":false,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"LBJ Escalates","add_section_content":"Johnson doubted that sending more troops to Vietnam would produce victory. He told McNamara in early July that when he asked Congress to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, he \u201chad no intention of committing this many ground troops. We\u2019re doing so now, and we know it\u2019s going to be bad.\u201d But Johnson refused to turn back. Haunted by the memory of Europe\u2019s appeasement of Hitler and by how Korea damaged Truman\u2019s presidency, Johnson feared that failure in South Vietnam would derail his ambitious Great Society agenda and demolish his presidency. As he told his wife Lady Bird Johnson on the day he decided, \u201cI don\u2019t want to get into a war, and I don\u2019t see any way out of it.\u201d\r\n\r\nJohnson decided to grant Westmoreland\u2019s request. He brushed aside suggestions that he break the news by addressing a joint session of Congress or giving a nationally televised address. Not wanting to alarm the public or signal the immensity of his decision, he instead used a midday press conference on July 28 to announce that fifty thousand more troops were headed to Vietnam, adding that \u201cadditional forces will be needed later, and they will be sent as requested.\u201d He also directed Westmoreland privately to use U.S. forces in Vietnam as he saw fit.","add_image":3329,"image_position":"right","background":true,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"President Lyndon B. Johnson\u2019s Press Conference on Vietnam, July 28, 1965","video_link":"","youtube_link":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dDwE_rOZ3pU"},{"quote_section":"videolink","add_section_title":"The Legacy of the Decision to Commit U.S Combat Troops to Vietnam","add_section_content":"Ball was right. The United States had 185,000 troops in Vietnam at the end of 1965. The total troop presence peaked at nearly 550,000 in 1968. As Johnson sent more troops, he consistently exaggerated the progress they were making. Then, in late January 1968, North Vietnamese and NLF forces launched the Tet Offensive, a surprise attack across South Vietnam. U.S. and South Vietnamese forces eventually turned back the attack, dealing a devastating blow to NLF forces in particular.\r\n\r\nWhat Americans saw on their television screens, however, contradicted what Johnson had led them to believe. In the face of the public backlash, he abandoned his run for reelection. His successor, Richard Nixon, escalated the bombing of North Vietnam and waged a secret bombing campaign against neighboring Cambodia and Laos, which failed to change the tide on the battlefield. The United States signed a peace treaty with North Vietnam in January 1973. North Vietnam overran South Vietnam two years later. More than\u00a058,000\u00a0Americans, and many more Vietnamese, died in the Vietnam War. The war Johnson chose to wage was unwinnable.","add_image":"","image_position":"null","background":false,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"President Lyndon B. Johnson\u2019s Press Conference on Vietnam, July 28, 1965","video_link":"","youtube_link":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dDwE_rOZ3pU"},{"quote_section":"imagecontent","add_section_title":"The Legacy of the Decision to Commit U.S Combat Troops to Vietnam","add_section_content":"Ball was right. The United States had 185,000 troops in Vietnam at the end of 1965. The total troop presence peaked at nearly 550,000 in 1968. As Johnson sent more troops, he consistently exaggerated the progress they were making. Then, in late January 1968, North Vietnamese and NLF forces launched the Tet Offensive, a surprise attack across South Vietnam. U.S. and South Vietnamese forces eventually turned back the attack, dealing a devastating blow to NLF forces in particular.\r\n\r\nWhat Americans saw on their television screens, however, contradicted what Johnson had led them to believe. In the face of the public backlash, he abandoned his run for reelection. His successor, Richard Nixon, escalated the bombing of North Vietnam and waged a secret bombing campaign against neighboring Cambodia and Laos, which failed to change the tide on the battlefield. The United States signed a peace treaty with North Vietnam in January 1973. North Vietnam overran South Vietnam two years later. More than\u00a058,000\u00a0Americans, and many more Vietnamese, died in the Vietnam War. The war Johnson chose to wage was unwinnable.","add_image":"","image_position":"null","background":false,"quote_content":"","quote_footer":"","video_title":"","video_link":null,"youtube_link":""}],"add_testimonials":[{"author_name":"Victor McFarland","add_testimonial_content":"The Vietnam War killed and injured millions of people, depleted U.S. resources, damaged America's image overseas, and inflamed political divisions at home. We're still living with the fallout.","add_university_department":"Associate Professor of History and Director of Graduate History Studies, University of Missouri","add_image":2267},{"author_name":"Jessica Chapman","add_testimonial_content":"The deployment of combat forces to Vietnam marked the formal beginning of America's war in Vietnam, which cost both the U.S. and Vietnam an enormous toll in lives, ravaged the Vietnamese environment, contributed to the further radicalization of DRV leadership, fueled the rise of the genocidal Khmer Rouge, damaged American credibility and self-confidence, and emboldened the Soviet Union in the Third World.","add_university_department":"Sue and Edgar Wachenheim III Professor of History Chair, Williams College","add_image":1831},{"author_name":"Sheyda Jahanbani","add_testimonial_content":"The decision to send U.S. combat troops to South Vietnam cost Americans untold blood and treasure while also destroying U.S. credibility as a force for democracy and human rights.","add_university_department":"Associate Professor of History and Director of Graduate History Studies, University of Kansas","add_image":2271},{"author_name":"Joseph Stieb","add_testimonial_content":"The United States had reason to help the Republic of Vietnam resist communist aggression, but taking the primary military role for saving a faltering, corrupt autocracy was a massive strategic blunder. The war was immoral, unnecessary, and had shattering impacts on U.S. foreign policy and domestic politics.","add_university_department":"Assistant Professor of History, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill","add_image":1383}],"learn_more_title":"Learn More","add_learn_more_content":"Primary documents, books, articles, and more on the deployment of U.S. combat forces to Vietnam. ","add_sources":[{"add_sources_title":"Primary Documents","single_source":[{"source_link_title":{"title":"John F. Kennedy, \u201cRemarks Before the Senate on Indochina,\u201d April 6, 1954","url":"https:\/\/www.jfklibrary.org\/archives\/other-resources\/john-f-kennedy-speeches\/united-states-senate-indochina-19540406","target":""},"source_content":"The text of Kennedy\u2019s speech as a senator arguing that \u201cno amount of American military assistance\" was likely to defeat the communist threat to Indochina. ","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Lyndon B. Johnson, \u201cRemarks in Memorial Hall, Akron University,\u201d October 21, 1964","url":"https:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/documents\/remarks-memorial-hall-akron-university","target":""},"source_content":"The text of LBJ\u2019s speech just before Election Day in 1964 saying that he had no intention of sending U.S. troops to Vietnam. ","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Lyndon B. Johnson, \u201cStatement by the President on Viet-Nam,\u201d March 25, 1965","url":"https:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/documents\/statement-the-president-viet-nam","target":""},"source_content":"A White House statement saying that the United States \u201cseeks no wider war.\u201d","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Lyndon B. Johnson, \u201cAddress at Johns Hopkins University: \u2018Peace Without Conquest,\u2019\u201d April 8, 1965","url":"https:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/documents\/address-johns-hopkins-university-peace-without-conquest","target":""},"source_content":"The text of Johnson\u2019s speech laying out the rationale for the U.S. involvement in Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Lyndon B. Johnson, \u201cStatement by the President: \u2018Tragedy, Disappointment, and Progress\u2019 in Viet-Nam,\u201d April 17, 1965","url":"https:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/documents\/statement-the-president-tragedy-disappointment-and-progress-viet-nam","target":""},"source_content":"In a statement he read to reporters, Johnson argues that U.S. troops are fighting in Vietnam \u201cbecause they are attacked, not because they are attackers.\u201d","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"George Ball, \u201cPaper by the Undersecretary of State,\u201d July 1, 1965","url":"https:\/\/history.state.gov\/historicaldocuments\/frus1964-68v03\/d40","target":""},"source_content":"The text of Ball\u2019s memo urging Johnson not to deepen U.S. military involvement in Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Robert McNamara, \u201cMemorandum to President Johnson,\u201d July 20, 1965","url":"https:\/\/history.state.gov\/historicaldocuments\/frus1964-68v03\/d67","target":""},"source_content":"The text of McNamara\u2019s memo arguing that the United States needed to send more combat troops to Vietnam to stave off defeat. ","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Lyndon Johnson, \u201cThe President\u2019s News Conference\u201d July 28, 1965","url":"https:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/documents\/the-presidents-news-conference-1038","target":""},"source_content":"A transcript of the press conference where Johnson announced further U.S. troop deployments to Vietnam and sought to explain why the United States was fighting there.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"LBJ Presidential Library and Miller Center at the University of Virginia, \u201cVietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/lbjtapes.org\/subject\/vietnam","target":""},"source_content":"The audio and transcripts of private phone conversations that Johnson had with administration officials and members of Congress about the war in Vietnam.","source_image":""}]},{"add_sources_title":"Books","single_source":[{"source_link_title":{"title":"Larry Berman, Planning a Tragedy: The Americanization of the War in Vietnam","url":"https:\/\/wwnorton.com\/books\/9780393953268","target":""},"source_content":"A political scientist, Berman examines the political landscape, the strategic debates, and the gradual shift to direct military intervention in Vietnam.","source_image":2281},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Gordon M. Goldstein, Lessons in Disaster: McGeorge Bundy and the Path to War in Vietnam","url":"https:\/\/us.macmillan.com\/books\/9780805090871\/lessonsindisaster\/","target":""},"source_content":"Goldstein builds on an unfinished book collaboration with Johnson\u2019s National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy to argue that the decision to send combat troops to Vietnam was a choice and not an inevitability.","source_image":2286},{"source_link_title":{"title":"David Halberstam, The Best and the Brightest","url":"https:\/\/www.penguinrandomhouse.com\/books\/73633\/the-best-and-the-brightest-by-david-halberstam\/","target":""},"source_content":"A classic history of the U.S. entry into the Vietnam War by a journalist who reported from Vietnam for the New York Times.","source_image":2292},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Frederik Logevall, Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam","url":"https:\/\/www.ucpress.edu\/books\/choosing-war\/paper","target":""},"source_content":"A Pulitzer Prize\u2013winning historian, Logevall argues that Johnson ignored advice from leading members of Congress and world leaders not to deepen U.S. involvement in Vietnam because he was worried about his personal credibility.","source_image":2296}]},{"add_sources_title":"Articles","single_source":[{"source_link_title":{"title":"Michael Beschloss, \u201cLBJ and the Descent Into War\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.historynet.com\/lbj-and-the-descent-into-war\/","target":""},"source_content":"Beschloss discusses why Johnson committed U.S. combat troops to Vietnam in the spring of 1965.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"David Coleman and Marc Selverstone, \u201cLyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War\u201d","url":"https:\/\/prde.upress.virginia.edu\/content\/Vietnam","target":""},"source_content":"Two historians who managed the archives of Johnson\u2019s presidential recordings assess the factors that led Johnson to conclude that he had \u201cno choice\u201d but to send U.S. combat troops to Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"George C. Herring, \u201cThe War Bells Have Rung: The LBJ Tapes and the Americanization of the Vietnam War\u201d","url":"https:\/\/prde.upress.virginia.edu\/content\/herring?ref=home","target":""},"source_content":"A leading scholar of the Vietnam War, Herring uses secret recordings of Johnson\u2019s phone calls to explain his decision to commit U.S. combat troops to Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Miller Center at the University of Virginia, \u201cAmericanization\u201d","url":"https:\/\/millercenter.org\/the-presidency\/educational-resources\/americanization","target":""},"source_content":"A look at Johnson\u2019s decision to substantially increase the number of U.S. ground troops in Vietnam that includes excerpts from the president\u2019s conversations with his advisers.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Heather Stur, \u201cWhy the United States Went to War in Vietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.fpri.org\/article\/2017\/04\/united-states-went-war-vietnam\/","target":""},"source_content":"Stur argues that the Americanization of the war in Vietnam reflected the three factors: Communism, the Cold War, and credibility.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"The Conversation, \u201cThe Choice: LBJ\u2019s Decision to Go to War in Vietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/the-choice-lbjs-decision-to-go-to-war-in-vietnam-38410","target":""},"source_content":"A look at why Johnson deepened U.S. involvement in Vietnam despite his personal doubts and the advice of some of his advisers.","source_image":""}]},{"add_sources_title":"Documentaries and Short Videos","single_source":[{"source_link_title":{"title":"PBS, \u201cGrowing American Presence in Vietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.pbslearningmedia.org\/resource\/7dabf981-5ca8-4a27-8b5d-9cf8e65c11ee\/growing-american-presence-in-vietnam-video-ken-burns-lynn-novick-the-vietnam-war\/","target":""},"source_content":"A seven-minute video that examines   Kennedy\u2019s decision to expand the U.S. military presence in Vietnam. ","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"PBS, \u201cLBJ\u2019s 1965 Decision to Escalate the Vietnam War\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.pbslearningmedia.org\/resource\/pres10.socst.ush.now.escalate\/lbjs-1965-decision-to-escalate-the-vietnam-war\/","target":""},"source_content":"A five-minute clip that discusses the factors that influenced the U.S. decision to commit combat troops to Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"World at War, \u201cWhy Did the Americans Get Involved?\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?qc=video+on+the+americanization+of+the+war+in+vietnam&amp;sca_esv=cea07bd29ebaa7bd&amp;rlz=1C1GCEU_enUS1063US1063&amp;sxsrf=AE3TifN1PLdBlvZnEXwCyGSpbWZd_GZIHQ:1767389163178&amp;ei=6zdYac7UCp2rmtkP0ZTPwAI&amp;start=20&amp;sa=N&amp;sstk=Af77f_dz08xrfKc0oVwZC3o_8noe8mo7sGvNchNut_FniRJqy-hJKjiRwOIQF65VlvKGdkDB4Lg2dvdfemZ132k2Wmxuq-wK-OgEz18sMeRTb28yXxOIh-DskURzp-jCI3By&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiO9oDa5e2RAxWdlSYFHVHKEyg4ChDy0wN6BAgLEAc&amp;biw=1504&amp;bih=834&amp;dpr=1.5#fpstate=ive&amp;vld=cid:ef820693,vid:oXKSdg6U6jQ,st:0","target":""},"source_content":"A fifty-two minute documentary prepared by the U.S. Department of Defense in the 1960s to explain why the United States was fighting in Vietnam.","source_image":""}]},{"add_sources_title":"Lectures and Podcasts","single_source":[{"source_link_title":{"title":"C-SPAN, \u201cLyndon Johnson and Escalation in Vietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7KIvUGGZp8c","target":""},"source_content":"Seth Jacobs, a professor of history at Boston College, discusses the factors that led Johnson to escalate the war in Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Empire Podcast, \u201cThe Vietnam War: Lyndon Johnson, Americanisation, and Operation Rolling Thunder\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1ZtuzmmlM60","target":""},"source_content":"Hosts Anita Anand and William Dalrymple discuss the Americanization of the Vietnam War with Pulitzer Prize\u2013winning historian Fredrik Logevall.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics, \u201cIn Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=wqzGVa22TO0","target":""},"source_content":"A panel that includes former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara discusses the implications of the U.S. escalation in Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"Public Radio International, \u201cThe Carrot and the Stick: LBJ Addresses the Nation on the Conflict in Vietnam\u201d","url":"https:\/\/theworld.org\/stories\/2017\/09\/15\/lbj-carrot-and-stick","target":""},"source_content":"Host David Brown explores why Johnson chose to deepen U.S. involvement in Vietnam.","source_image":""},{"source_link_title":{"title":"War Room, \u201cAmerica in Vietnam: When the Best and Brightest Go Wrong\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=E_Ksqn0y__Y","target":""},"source_content":"Historian Brian Vander Mark discusses why the United States chose to go to war in Vietnam.","source_image":""}]},{"add_sources_title":"Timeline","single_source":[{"source_link_title":{"title":"History.com, \u201cVietnam War Timeline\u201d","url":"https:\/\/www.history.com\/articles\/vietnam-war-timeline","target":""},"source_content":"","source_image":""}]}],"add_bottom_title":"","add_bottom_image":"","add_background_image":"","add_bottom_button":"","add_year":"1965"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/build.mini.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/06\/Screenshot2025-07-16-165053.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63"}],"version-history":[{"count":92,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3504,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63\/revisions\/3504"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cfr.org\/ten-best-ten-worst-us-foreign-policy-decisions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}