U.S. Must Better Prepare Its Workforce for the Promise and Perils of Technology, Asserts CFR Task Force

April 10, 2018

News Releases

April 10, 2018—“The world is in the midst of a profound transformation in the nature of work, as smart machines and other new technologies remake how people do their jobs and pursue their careers,” says a new Council on Foreign Relations–sponsored Independent Task Force. It asserts that the United States has not stepped up to meet these new challenges and that “governments, businesses, educators, and other institutions need to do far more to help Americans adapt and thrive in the face of these disruptive forces.”

More From Our Experts

The Task Force, co-chaired by former Michigan Governor John Engler and former U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, notes that rapid technological change, heightened global competition, and growing barriers to opportunity have weakened the link between work and rewards. While new opportunities will likely be created to replace those lost, American workers face substantial obstacles in acquiring the education and skills needed to prosper in a more automated work environment. An estimate by McKinsey Global Institute notes that as many as one-third of American workers may need to change occupations and acquire new skills by 2030 due to automation.

More on:

Labor and Employment

U.S. Economy

Technology and Innovation

Education

Automation

“Even with the reasonably strong job growth of recent years, the divide between those succeeding and those struggling is growing, regional disparities are increasing, economic inequality is rising, and public anger is deepening political divisions,” warns the Task Force. “The country’s future as a stable, strong nation willing and able to devote the necessary resources and attention to meeting international challenges depends on rebuilding the links among work, opportunity, and economic security.” A failure to address the nation’s workforce challenge “will increase the pressures for retrenchment that are already causing the United States to back away from global leadership.”

The bipartisan Task Force is composed of nineteen individuals who represent a range of areas of expertise; Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow Edward Alden serves as director, and International Affairs Fellow Laura Taylor-Kale serves as deputy director. The group’s report, The Work Ahead: Machines, Skills, and U.S. Leadership in the Twenty-First Century, includes a number of findings and recommendations for the federal, state, and local government, as well as the private sector. A related video examines the challenges and solutions for preparing the U.S. workforce for future jobs.

  • Help Americans take advantage of the opportunities posed by technology. “Technology has been the biggest cause of job disruption in recent decades, and the pace of change is likely to accelerate. . . . Occupations that are especially vulnerable include manufacturing, food service, and retail trade,” but many other sectors will also be affected. “Many of the new jobs being created will require significantly higher levels of education and skills.”
  • Strengthen the link between education and employment. “The challenge is not just providing more education but providing better-targeted education that leads to better work opportunities. . . . The goal should be to link educational offerings more closely with employment outcomes, in particular by expanding apprenticeships, work-study programs, and internships to strengthen the link between education and work. New initiatives are also needed to improve affordability and access to postsecondary education, and to encourage lifelong learning.”
  • Spur job creation, especially for better-paying jobs. “Most of the advanced economies have seen rising inequality in wage earnings and a falling labor share of income. But the polarization has been more extreme in the United States than in other similar economies. The best antidote to these polarizing trends [is] a strongly growing economy that is at or near full employment.” Employers should commit themselves to creating a “high-road workplace” that offers employees decent pay, training, scheduling, and benefits.
  • Make the skill demands of jobs more transparent. Employers should work with governments and educational institutions to improve credential quality. “Improvements in credential quality and transparency will also feed back into the educational choices of young people, helping companies to develop the talent pipelines they need.” Many “employees who could do the jobs that are open are not in the right places, have earned credentials that are not recognized, or are not being hired even though they have the right capabilities for the job.”
  • Provide better help for displaced workers. The United States spends just 0.1 percent of gross domestic product, roughly one-fifth of what the average European country spends, on training and assistance for those who have lost jobs. The United States needs to emulate the best models for helping displaced workers.
  • Improve the benefits and returns from work for all Americans. “Workers in alternative arrangements—including independent contractors, freelancers, temporary employees, and gig economy workers—now make up some 16 percent of the total U.S. workforce, a figure that has grown by half over the last decade . . . . The United States should create portable systems of employment benefits tied to individual employees rather than to the jobs themselves.”
  • Understand that the problems will not be solved by Washington alone. “To underscore the urgency of the task of building the workforce of the future, the president and the nation’s governors should create a National Commission on the U.S. Workforce to carry out research, share best practices, and conduct public outreach on workforce challenges. This should be the start of an ongoing effort to put workforce issues at the center of the national conversation.”
More From Our Experts

“To prosper and to lead, the United States needs to find new ways to meet the workforce challenges of the twenty-first century,” the Task Force concludes.

To view the full report, including videos, a quiz, and interactive elements, please visit cfr.org/TheWorkAhead.

***
Independent Task Force Members
Chike Aguh, EveryoneOn
Edward Alden, Council on Foreign Relations
Eric R. Biel, Fair Labor Association
Allen Blue, LinkedIn
John Engler, Michigan State University
Diana Farrell, JPMorgan Chase Institute
Kian Gohar, XPRIZE Foundation
Gordon Hanson, University of California, San Diego’s School of Global Policy and Strategy
Robert M. Kimmitt, WilmerHale
Susan Lund, McKinsey Global Institute
Jack Markell
Jamie P. Merisotis, Lumina Foundation
Rodrick T. Miller, Ascendant Global
Eduardo J. Padrón, Miami Dade College
Penny Pritzker, PSP Partners
Cecilia E. Rouse, Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
Lee J. Styslinger III, Altec Inc.
Hemant Taneja, General Catalyst Partners
Laura Taylor-Kale, Council on Foreign Relations
***

CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force reports offer analysis of and policy prescriptions for major foreign policy issues facing the United States, developed through private deliberations among a diverse and distinguished group of experts. Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation. They participate in the Task Force in their individual, not institutional, capacities.

 

More on:

Labor and Employment

U.S. Economy

Technology and Innovation

Education

Automation

Up
Creative Commons
Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.
Close
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.
View License Detail
Close

Explore More on CFR

Public Health Threats and Pandemics

Endemic to the African tropics, the Ebola virus has killed thousands in recent years, putting the World Health Organization and major donor countries in the limelight as they’ve grappled with how to respond to outbreaks.

Canada

A trade war with Canada makes no strategic sense.

North Korea