Could Climate Change Break Home Insurance?

For decades, U.S. homeowners have counted on property insurance to protect them from catastrophic loss if their homes are destroyed—and the U.S. economy has rested on the functionality of that model. But as this summer’s extreme weather broke records, private companies reduced their coverage. As climate disasters become more frequent, can home insurance hold up?

Play Button Pause Button
0:00 0:00
x
Host
  • Gabrielle Sierra
    Director, Podcasting
Credits

Asher Ross - Supervising Producer

Markus Zakaria - Audio Producer and Sound Designer

Molly McAnany - Associate Podcast Producer

Episode Guests
  • Nancy Watkins
    Principal and Consulting Actuary, Milliman
  • David Marlett
    Managing Director of the Brantley Risk & Insurance Center, Appalachian State University

Show Notes

Homeownership has long been a pillar of the U.S. economy. For many Americans, a house is by far their largest asset. Naturally, they want to protect it in case of disaster, so they buy home insurance. Today, that model is under threat. Why? Climate change.

 

Seeing the increasing destruction wrought by a changing climate, private insurers have opted to reduce or eliminate coverage in some states. Now facing the risk of losing home insurance in addition to the ever-present threat of natural disasters, Americans living in risky areas might be forced to confront a decision to leave their homes for good. The government has, thus far, stepped in to replace fleeing insurers, though its public insurance programs are more expensive for both homeowners and taxpayers. However, there are a number of other solutions policymakers can consider to reduce the risk of a climate change-fueled collapse of U.S. home insurance.

 

 

From CFR

 

Alice Hill, “Climate Change and U.S. Property Insurance: A Stormy Mix

 

Alice Hill, “The Age of Climate Disaster Is Here,” Foreign Affairs


 

From Our Guests

 

Nancy Watkins, “Prepared Testimony of Nancy Watkins,” [PDF] Risky Business: How Climate Change is Changing Insurance Markets, U.S. Senate Committee on the Budget

 

 

Read More

 

Michael Copley, Rebecca Hersher, and Nathan Rott, How Climate Change Could Cause a Home Insurance Meltdown,” NPR

 

Jean Eaglesham, “Home Insurers Are Charging More and Insuring Less,” Wall Street Journal

 

David D. Evans, Cody Webb, Eric J. Xu, “Wildfire Catastrophe Model Could Spark the Changes California Needs,” [PDF] Milliman 


 

Watch and Listen

 

Innovating Solutions to the Climate Crisis,” CFR.org


How Climate Change Is Impacting Home Insurance Premiums,” NBC News

Trade

Global trade tensions are boiling over and questions about the United States’ economic future are at the center of the debate. As trade experts question what comes next, it’s important to analyze how the United States got to this point. How have the current administration’s trade policies of today reshaped the global order of tomorrow?

U.S. Trade Deficit

The United States has had a trade deficit, meaning we import more than we export, for the past fifty years. But recently the trade deficit has become a front-burner issue for President Donald Trump and a core reason for his administration’s sweeping tariff policy. When do trade deficits become a problem? Is the United States already at the tipping point?

Trade

With allies and adversaries alike impacted by new economic barriers and tariffs, the global map of U.S. trade relationships hangs in question. As the U.S. rethinks its commitments with its trading partners, allies may seek deals elsewhere, even with historic rivals. Can the president single-handedly tear up a trade deal, and what happens when deals that took decades to craft are suddenly up for renegotiation?

Top Stories on CFR

Climate Change

The legislation promoted by Trump and the White House will undo many of the climate and energy initiatives and tax credit programs passed during the Joe Biden administration.

Iran

Countries without nuclear weapons could decide nuclear nonproliferation and transparency efforts that the world has taken for granted now pose more risk than reward.

Ukraine

President Donald Trump is right to pursue diplomacy in Ukraine, but success requires a dual approach. To deliver on his promise to end the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump will need to offer Russia sticks as well as carrots.