What Does the Chinese Politburo Know?

This week brought yet more prison terms for yet more Chinese dissidents.  As the Washington Post reported,

Many Western observers see China as a mighty fortress, growing in economic and military strength, yet its own rulers see a handful of bloggers as “a serious threat to China’s political and social stability.” The so-called “Arab Spring” of 2011 is a reminder that the Chinese rulers are right: regimes that appear absolutely solid from the outside can not only appear but actually be rotten and weak when viewed from the inside. When I served at the National Security Council I had numerous opportunitiues to observe Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak. While academics and analysts were certain that the regime in Egypt was stable (and Secretary of State Clinton called it stable, presumably on the very best advice available to her, just two weeks before Mubarak fell) it was striking to me that Mubarak  never regarded it that way. All he needed to see was a small bread riot in some town no-one had ever heard of, and he was spending millions on greater food subsidies to lower the price of bread. He knew very well that his regime lacked legitimacy and ruled by force alone.

And that is what the Chinese rulers know as well. They jail men and women for ten years for posting an essay on the internet because they are well aware of the tenuousness of their hold on the minds of the Chinese people. Their communist training has taught them that a revolution that appears impossible before it takes place will be considered historically inevitable once it has happened--and their knowledge of Chinese history has taught them that political change is indeed possible. The lesson for us is not to regard tyranny as China’s inevitable and permanent state, and instead to continue to support the desire for freedom that is so evident there.