from The Internationalist and International Institutions and Global Governance Program

Brexit, Voice, and Loyalty: Britain’s Torturous EU Exit and the Dilemmas of National Sovereignty

An official carries a Union Jack flag ahead of a news conference by Britain's Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union David Davis and European Union's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier in Brussels, Belgium on July 20, 2017. Francois Lenoir/Reuters

In choosing to leave the EU, British voters decided that Brexit was the only way to preserve their national sovereignty. But in choosing to leave that club, they are experiencing the trade-offs inherent in modern sovereignty.

September 18, 2018

An official carries a Union Jack flag ahead of a news conference by Britain's Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union David Davis and European Union's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier in Brussels, Belgium on July 20, 2017. Francois Lenoir/Reuters
Blog Post
Blog posts represent the views of CFR fellows and staff and not those of CFR, which takes no institutional positions.

In an article recently published in World Politics ReviewTerrence Mullan and I argue that the Brexit calamity is a cautionary tale about the complexities and trade-offs of exercising national sovereignty in an age of interdependence. 

More than two years after narrowly approving a referendum to leave the European Union, the British are discovering that asserting national sovereignty is less straightforward than the proponents of Brexit promised. Leaders of the “Leave” campaign in 2016 painted the issue in black and white. Britain had subordinated its sovereignty to Brussels, not least its authority to control its own borders. A fully independent Britain would regain those rights, while also negotiating a favorable, bespoke trade agreement with the EU’s remaining 27 members. With only seven months left before the deadline to leave the EU, it is clear that this scenario was a fantasy. Britain is experiencing the trade-offs inherent in modern national sovereignty. 

Frequently invoked but rarely understood, “national sovereignty” is a lightning rod in many countries, notably the United States, where it animates much of President Donald Trump’s foreign policy. It connotes qualities of statehood that are both inherent and sacred: namely, complete political independence, freedom of action both at home and abroad, and the ability to control the nation’s destiny. The practical dilemma is that these three components of sovereignty—call them authority, autonomy and influence—do not always go together. 

More on:

United Kingdom

Sovereignty

Trade

Theresa May

European Union

Read the full article here.

More on:

United Kingdom

Sovereignty

Trade

Theresa May

European Union

Up
Creative Commons
Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.
Close
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.
View License Detail
Close