Turkey’s Protests: Three Things to Know

June 6, 2013

Turkey’s Protests: Three Things to Know
Explainer Video
from Video

A demonstration over plans to replace Istanbul’s Gezi Park with an urban development project has inspired widespread anti-government protests across Turkey. Steven Cook, CFR’s senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies, highlights three things to know about the protests:

More From Our Experts

More on:

Political Movements

Turkey

Protests Will Not Oust Erdogan: The protests in Turkey should not be equated with uprisings in Egypt or other Arab countries, Cook emphasizes. If Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is to leave, it can only happen "through the ballot box," he says.

More on:

Political Movements

Turkey

Broader Concerns at Play: While the development plans for Gezi Park had originally sparked the protests, these demonstrations are about the "authoritarian turn in Turkish politics," says Cook. Protestors are voicing their concerns over larger issues such as environmental destruction, police brutality, crony capitalism, and the "marginalization of the people who disagree with [Erdogan’s] world view."

More From Our Experts

More on:

Political Movements

Turkey

Defusing Tensions: The demonstrations can only be defused "through some type of gesture from Prime Minister Erdogan himself," Cook argues. Attempts by other Turkish leaders to quell tensions have so far been unsuccessful because so much of the public anger is directed at Erdogan personally.

More on:

Political Movements

Turkey

Close

Top Stories on CFR

United Kingdom

UK Prime Minister Theresa May has been unable to convince her own party to pass the Brexit deal she negotiated with the European Union because of its backstop provision. What is it, and why does it matter?

Nigeria

February’s presidential election does not inspire confidence in the democratic trajectory of Africa’s most populous country.

North Korea

It is time to put denuclearization on the back burner and adopt realistic approaches toward North Korea. An all-or-nothing approach will yield nothing, leaving the United States worse off than before the diplomatic outreach began.