Reducing Tensions Between Russia and NATO
Council Special Report from Center for Preventive Action
Council Special Report from Center for Preventive Action

Reducing Tensions Between Russia and NATO

March 2017 , 51 Pages

Council Special Report
Concise policy briefs that provide timely responses to developing crises or contributions to current policy dilemmas.

Overview

“[Vladimir] Putin’s aggression makes the possibility of a war in Europe between nuclear-armed adversaries frighteningly real,” writes Kimberly Marten in a new Council Special Report on tensions between Russia and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). She outlines how U.S. policymakers can deter Russian aggression with robust support for NATO, while reassuring Russia of NATO’s defensive intentions through clear words and actions based in international law.

Kimberly Marten

Ann Whitney Olin Professor of Political Science, Barnard College

Marten, a professor of political science at Barnard College, Columbia University, and director of the Program on U.S.-Russia Relations at Columbia’s Harriman Institute, lays out several scenarios that could lead to a dangerous confrontation, ranging from an inadvertent encounter between NATO and Russian military aircraft or ships to an intentional Russian land grab in Europe. The report, produced by the Center for Preventive Action at the Council on Foreign Relations, offers a plan for how the Donald J. Trump administration could work with Congress and NATO allies to lessen the chances of crisis escalation.

Marten recommends that U.S. policymakers take the following steps to deter Russian threats:

More on:

Russia

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)

Europe and Eurasia

Vladimir Putin

  • Reaffirm the U.S. commitment to NATO defense. “President Trump should immediately reaffirm, and the State Department and Pentagon should periodically restate, that the defense of all NATO member states is Washington’s highest priority in Europe.”
  • Sustain U.S. troop deployments in Poland, while emphasizing the deployments’ legitimacy under past international agreements with Moscow. The president and the Pentagon should urge allies to honor their parallel commitments in the Baltics and stress that these deployments are “far lower than what Russia itself agreed as being legitimate in 1999.”
  • Rely on—and publicize—comprehensive, superior capabilities to deter Russia. Historically, NATO never relied on matching conventional forces to deter superior Soviet conventional deployments. Similarly, the United States and NATO should today rely on asymmetrical capabilities, like offensive battlefield cyber capabilities and the threat of sanctions, rather than large new conventional force deployments in Europe.
  • Encourage NATO to think creatively about measures that would significantly raise the costs for Russia of attacking NATO and therefore make such an attack less attractive and less likely.

She also suggests a series of reassurance measures to demonstrate that the United States and NATO have only defensive intentions, including:

  • Treat Russian leaders and the Russian state with public respect even if tensions rise. “The Trump administration will achieve more if it remains diplomatic and unemotional, and helps Russian leaders save face at home.”
  • Formally announce that the United States does not seek to impose regime change on Russia and ask Putin to reciprocate, proposing a new accord to limit cyber attacks against civilian targets in peacetime.
  • Explicitly tie planned deployment of interceptor missiles at the U.S. ballistic missile defense (BMD) system in Poland to Iran fulfilling its commitments in the nuclear nonproliferation deal reached in 2015. “To demonstrate that this BMD system is indeed designed against a threat from Iran and not Russia, the United States should reach agreement with Poland that missiles will be stored on U.S. territory,” unless Iran violates its obligations.
  • Publicly state that the United States believes Ukraine has not currently met NATO membership standards and has a long way to go.
  • Reestablish regional military and arms control negotiations, especially in the Baltics. “If relatively narrow military-to-military dangerous incident agreements prove workable, it would be a sign that Moscow might genuinely be receptive to reopening larger arms control negotiations.”

Marten acknowledges that President Trump’s “efforts to reach out to Russian President Vladimir Putin and launch another ‘reset’ policy may lead to new accord between the two countries,” but expresses fear that “Putin will test Trump’s strength by seeking unequal advantages for Moscow.”

Professors: To request an exam copy, contact [email protected]. Please include your university and course name.

More on:

Russia

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)

Europe and Eurasia

Vladimir Putin

Bookstores: To order bulk copies, please contact Ingram. Visit https://ipage.ingrambook.com, call 800.234.6737, or email [email protected]. ISBN: 978-0-87609-710-6

Top Stories on CFR

Daily News Brief

Welcome to the Daily News Brief, CFR’s flagship morning newsletter summarizing the top global news and analysis of the day.  Subscribe to the Daily News Brief to receive it every weekday morning. Top of the Agenda Fighting broke out again this morning in southern Syria, in spite of a ceasefire declared by the country’s interim government yesterday. Clashes between Bedouin tribes and Druze militias began around the city of Sweida over the weekend, reportedly after members of a Bedouin group attacked a Druze man at a checkpoint they had made.  The latest.  Mounting clashes between the Syrian government and Druze armed groups are stirring concerns about new instability in the fragile state. On Monday, Syrian government forces deployed to the area and clashed with Druze armed groups, and fighting has continued throughout the week. Reuters reported that Syrian troops looted and damaged homes yesterday.  This morning, Israel struck the entrance to the Syrian defense ministry in Damascus, sixty-seven miles away. Israel has carried out direct attacks on Syrian government forces for the past three days, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordering his military to strike Syrian troops and weapons throughout the Sweida area. An Israeli cabinet member and minister called for Syria’s interim president to be “eliminated” in a social media post. Syria condemned Israel’s intervention, saying it was a violation of international law. A war monitor based in the United Kingdom (UK) estimated yesterday that the death toll had surpassed two hundred people. The background.  Bedouin and Druze groups have longstanding tensions in Sweida, a Druze-majority city where this week’s violence has taken place.  Israel built up its military and settler presence in the Golan Heights after Syrian dictator Bashaar al-Assad’s ouster in December. It says it wants to secure its northern border, as well as Syria’s Druze minority, which Israel views as potential allies. The latest violence marks another test for the new Syrian government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, who became interim president after his rebel coalition overthrew Assad. He has struggled to control armed groups and militias in this region and the broader country.  “As long as many groups, such as Druze militias in the southwest and the Kurds in the northeast, remain out of its orbit, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) will only have partial control over Syria. At some point, HTS will have to try to co-opt these groups, confront them, or tacitly accept a de facto reality in which it does not exert control over all of Syria. Inaction risks making the reconstruction of a centralized state impossible.” —The International Crisis Group’s Jerome Drevon, Foreign Affairs Across the Globe Relocations after UK data leak. The UK began secretly moving thousands of people from Afghanistan after a data leak put them at risk from the Taliban. The breach of Britain’s Ministry of Defense data happened in 2022 and revealed details about Afghans who had assisted the UK. A media injunction stopped the information from becoming public at the time; it was lifted yesterday.  RSF accused of killings. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary in Sudan has killed more than three hundred people in raids since Saturday, according to Sudanese activists and rights groups. sIt actions targeted villages with civilians, thus violating international law, one group said. The United Nations estimated that 3,400 people fled during recent fighting. Gaza humanitarian crisis. Malnutrition among children has doubled since Israel broke a ceasefire and severely restricted aid entering Gaza in March, the United Nations said yesterday. Separately, the Israel- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) acknowledged today for the first time that people seeking aid were killed: GHF blamed Hamas for twenty deaths without offering evidence, while witnesses and the Gaza Health Ministry said GHF had used tear gas and caused a stampede. GHF had not previously recognized widely reported killings near its distribution sites, which has been estimated at nearly eight hundred between late May and July 7. EU retaliatory tariffs. The European Union (EU) will consider countermeasures including levies on bourbon, Boeing aircraft, and cars if trade talks with the United States are not successful, according to a document shared with members and viewed by the Financial Times. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened the bloc with 30 percent tariffs last weekend and set an August 1 deadline for talks. The EU has said it hopes to negotiate a deal. China’s economic growth. The country’s economy grew by 5.3 percent in the first half of 2025 in spite of an ongoing trade war with the United States. The boost was spurred by exports from manufacturers, with both customers and businesses making use of a temporary truce in Beijing and Washington’s trade war; negotiators from both countries are working on a more permanent deal. Earlier this week, Washington reversed a ban on the sale of Nvidia chips in China. PEPFAR exempt from cuts. The White House has agreed to restore $400 million in funding for a global program to combat AIDS as part of amendments to a rescission package, according to Senate Republicans. The George W. Bush-era initiative has saved tens of millions of lives. Other revisions to the bill could include language that spares maternal health, malaria, nutrition, and tuberculosis programs.  Deportations to Eswatini. The United States has deported five men to Eswatini, the Department of Homeland Security confirmed yesterday. They are from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam, and Yemen. Washington has restarted deportations to non-origin countries after the Supreme Court removed limits on such actions last month. U.S. border czar Tom Homan said last week he didn’t know the fate of eight people with no ties to South Sudan who were deported to that country. Turkish opposition leader sentenced. Ekrem İmamoğlu, the mayor of Istanbul and the most popular opposition challenger to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, was sentenced to two years in prison this morning. İmamoğlu was found guilty of threatening a prosecutor, which he denies; he has called the country’s legal process politicized. Turkish authorities had arrested İmamoğlu in March, the day before he announced a presidential run. Today’s sentencing does not ban İmamoğlu from politics, though he faces additional legal challenges. What’s Next Today, China hosts an International Supply Chain Expo in Beijing. Today, a trial opens in Delaware that seeks to hold Mark Zuckerberg and other Meta officials liable for privacy violations on the platform Today, a judge in Nashville will consider the Justice Department's bid to revoke Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s bail. Tomorrow, Africa’s environment ministers will gather over dwindling climate finance in Nairobi.

Nuclear Energy

As President Trump seeks to cut clean energy funding across the country, nuclear energy emerges as a rare area of bipartisan alignment and a priority for the administration. Yet inconsistent and conflicting federal policies threaten to impede efforts to promote nuclear energy production.

United States

Ten CFR experts break down what the president’s trade agenda has accomplished since he placed a ninety-day pause on his expansive “Liberation Day” tariffs.