Understanding Bolivia’s Election

In Brief

Understanding Bolivia’s Election

Exit polls indicate socialist candidate Luis Arce will become Bolivia’s next president. The peaceful vote signaled an end to a year of electoral uncertainty, but the victor will now confront social upheaval and economic hardship intensified by the coronavirus pandemic. 

What happened in Bolivia’s October 18 presidential election?

Former finance minister Luis Arce of the leftist Movement Toward Socialism (MAS)—the party of exiled former President Evo Morales—faced off against centrist Carlos Mesa, who previously served as vice president and president of Bolivia. Right-wing candidate Luis Fernando Camacho was also in the running.

More From Our Experts

Three private exit polls indicated that Arce won enough votes to avoid a second-round runoff. According to Bolivia’s constitution, a candidate must win either a simple majority, or at least 40 percent of the vote with a 10-point lead or greater. Official results could take several days, but interim President Jeanine Anez congratulated Arce and his running mate, David Choquehuanca, for their victory just hours after the polls closed. The day after the election, Mesa conceded.

Was the election legitimate?

More on:

Bolivia

Elections and Voting

This election was a rerun of Bolivia’s October 2019 presidential election, which was rife with accusations of fraud. The Organization of American States (OAS) acknowledged disturbing irregularities that appeared to favor Morales, who resigned and left the country amid mass protests, political violence, and military pressure. Anez, second vice president of the nation’s Senate, was sworn in as interim president in November 2019.

Many on the left saw the appointment of conservative Anez as a coup, while many moderates and conservatives called Morales’s departure a victory for democracy. With Morales in exile in Argentina, MAS leaders accepted a new electoral timeline, setting the date for the new election in May 2020. However, the coronavirus pandemic forced postponements until October 18.

Women in skirts, aprons, and hats gather near a cardboard ballot box.  On of them, wearing a mask, is placing her ballot inside.
Rosa Blanco casts her vote during the presidential election, in Cohoni, Bolivia, on October 18, 2020. Wara Vargas Lara/Reuters

This election contrasted starkly with the one held last October. Election day was relatively peaceful, with long lines of mostly socially distanced voters waiting to cast their ballots. Rumors of voter intimidation and violence by the right abounded on social media, but actual proceedings—which were observed by a team of OAS monitors—remained calm and orderly. A peaceful election was not guaranteed; in the months prior to voting day, Bolivia experienced an uptick in political violence, with the United Nations documenting at least forty-one such acts.

More From Our Experts

Were the results unexpected?

Yes and no. Arce had consistently topped preelection polls. But for at least a month, polling indicated that neither Arce nor Mesa would score an outright victory. The most meaningful change occurred when Anez withdrew her candidacy in September, after polls had her trailing in fourth place. Since then, Arce generally polled ahead, but his initially strong margin weakened as legal charges of terrorism, terrorist financing, and sexual abuse mounted against the exiled Morales. Most watchers assumed that a second-round runoff between Arce and Mesa was all but guaranteed.

Does Arce’s win reflect Morales’s popularity?

Arce’s position as a soft-spoken, uncontroversial technocrat, combined with his championing of popular redistributive reforms, won him the election. He was not without his own bona fides: as finance minister, Arce presided over a massive reduction in poverty, even as commodity prices collapsed over the last decade. The strong victory for MAS, compared to the election of 2019, shows that it was Morales’s increasing authoritarianism and disregard for institutional checks and balances, rather than his socialist ideology, that lost him popular support last year. In addition, Anez’s divisive tenure, in which she overstepped her bounds as interim president by charting a new foreign policy and repressing her political opponents, soured many voters to a conservative turn in the country.

More on:

Bolivia

Elections and Voting

What’s next?

Arce’s win represents a victory for Latin America’s left, which had been forced into retreat over the past decade. Nevertheless, Bolivia’s next president will face formidable challenges: fighting the coronavirus pandemic, navigating a regional economic contraction, and healing stark social divisions. Morales, though in exile, remains a powerful figure whose influence could constrain Arce’s ability to chart his own course. With a solid majority of Bolivians behind him, Arce has a green light to preserve his mentor’s socialist policies, including redistributive economic programs aimed at reducing inequality. However, some of the MAS’s younger leaders have sought to distance themselves from Morales over his executive overreach and charges of sexual misconduct, and Arce will face pressure to bridge the dissenting views within his own party.

Even if these elections signify the end of a turbulent year in Bolivia, Arce will confront a polarized political climate, one that can only be remedied if he makes good on his promise of “governing the country for all Bolivians.”

Creative Commons
Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.
Close
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.
View License Detail
Close

Top Stories on CFR

United States

Each Friday, I look at what the presidential contenders are saying about foreign policy. This Week: Joe Biden doesn’t want one of America’s closest allies to buy a once iconic American company.

Immigration and Migration

Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the record surge in migrants and asylum seekers crossing the U.S. southern border.

Center for Preventive Action

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?