Skip to content

Preserving a Rules-Based Order in the South China Sea

A UN tribunal’s ruling upholds the need for a rules-based order that counters China’s efforts to turn the South China Sea region into a sphere of influence, says expert Andrew Erickson.

By experts and staff

Published

By

  • Eleanor Albert
    Online Writer/Editor
  • Andrew S. Erickson

The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague rejected critical aspects of Beijing’s claims over waters in the South China Sea on Tuesday. The tribunal’s findings uphold the need for a rules-based order to counter Chinese efforts to establish a modern-day sphere of influence, says the U.S. Naval War College’s Andrew Erickson in a written interview. “It would be best for the [Asia-Pacific] region, and China’s standing within it, if Beijing exercises restraint and respects the tribunal’s ruling,” says Erickson. For its part, the United States should carry out more robust freedom of navigation operations (FONOPS) to protect international law and norms, he says.

Activists who travelled to disputed Scarborough Shoal and were blocked by Chinese Coastguard a few months ago react after a ruling on the disputed South China Sea by an arbitration court, Manila, Philippines, July 12, 2016. (Photo: Erik De Castro/Reuters)