Geostrategic and Military Drivers and Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative

Chinese President Xi Jinping attends a news conference at the end of the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing, China. May 15, 2017. Jason Lee/Reuters

January 25, 2018

Chinese President Xi Jinping attends a news conference at the end of the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing, China. May 15, 2017. Jason Lee/Reuters
Testimony
Testimony by CFR fellows and experts before Congress.

More on:

China

Belt and Road Initiative

United States

Defense and Security

Economics

In testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Ely Ratner assessed the geostrategic drivers and implications of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). He recommended situating the U.S. response to BRI within a comprehensive and competitive China policy that reasserts U.S. leadership in economic, military, political, and information domains. To this end, the United States should address security concerns that result from BRI by preventing Chinese control of the South China Sea, rejoining the Trans-Pacific Partnership, shifting overseas security burdens to China, enhancing U.S. broadcasting and information operations, and building capacity in recipient countries to manage and evaluate potential BRI projects.

Takeaways:

  • BRI will likely result in increased overseas access and presence for the People’s Liberation Army. To limit the destabilizing effects of greater Chinese force projection capabilities, the United States should redouble efforts to sustain its military advantage in East Asia and prevent Chinese control of the South China Sea.
  • The security and military implications of BRI will largely result from perceptions of a China-led economic order in Asia, whereby Beijing’s potential inducements and punishments will lead countries to limit their security cooperation with the United States and be less willing to push back on Chinese assertiveness. To counter these efforts, the United States will have to exhibit greater leadership on trade and economics in Asia, providing an economic alternative by rejoining the Trans-Pacific Partnership or initiating an equally ambitious multilateral arrangement.
  • The influence China is garnering from Belt and Road—and the ancillary effects on security and military matters of importance to the United States—far outstrip the actual economic value of the projects. This calls for U.S. media and information platforms that can provide more public information about the facts and fictions of BRI, as well as the degree of U.S. and other countries’ investment and assistance throughout Asia.
  • Negative externalities will develop from BRI if recipient countries are subject to corruption and coercion, or caught in debt traps that China exploits for political and strategic ends. The United States should therefore team up with like-minded countries (including Australia, Japan, and Singapore) to provide technical assistance that would help recipient countries evaluate proposed major infrastructure projects.

More on:

China

Belt and Road Initiative

United States

Defense and Security

Economics

Up

Explore More on CFR

Foreign Aid

During its fifteen years, PEPFAR has become one of the most important global health initiatives ever launched. However, its influence is fading, threatening the global fight against HIV/AIDS as the struggle against the pandemic faces a turning point.

Digital Policy

New Facebook data reveals that foreign advertisers may have tried to influence the upcoming Irish referendum on abortion. More proof that ad transparency initiatives for social media are necessary to preserve the integrity of elections.

Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

Though President Trump withdrew from the TPP, the remaining members of the trade pact have forged ahead with a new version, leaving the U.S. role in the Asia-Pacific in question.