Global Order and the New Regionalism

Discussion Paper Series on Global and Regional Governance

September 26, 2016

Report

Overview

Regional institutions and initiatives have proliferated in the twenty-first century. This latest wave of regional innovation raises, in new guise, a long-standing conundrum for global order and U.S. foreign policy: When is regional organization a useful, even essential, complement to the ends of global governance—financial stability, an open trading system, sustainable development, robust protection of human rights, or the end of civil wars—and when does it threaten or undermine the achievement of those goals? The new regionalism presents the prospect for new benefits for global order as well as new risks. How those challenges and risks are addressed, by the United States and by other member states, will determine whether a fragmented global order or more effective global and regional governance emerge over the next decade.

Miles Kahler

Senior Fellow for Global Governance

C. Randall Henning

Professor, American University’s School of International Service

Chad P. Bown

Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics

Hongying Wang

Associate Professor, University of Waterloo

Erik Voeten

Peter F. Krogh Professor of Geopolitics and Justice in World Affairs, Georgetown University

Paul D. Williams

Associate Professor, George Washington University

Five authors examine these dilemmas across five issue areas: finance, trade, development lending, human rights, and peace operations. In each issue area, regional actors and institutions have emerged that reopen and recast earlier debates about regionalism and its effects on global order. In four of the five issue areas, a single, established global institution contends with regional alternatives: the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Bank, and the United Nations. In the domain of human rights, the newly redesigned UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) does not enjoy a similar, central position; global human rights conventions set the normative frame for regional human rights commissions and courts. Each author suggests ways in which the new regionalism can be harnessed to serve global purposes and the contribution that U.S. policy can make to those ends.

Selected Figures From This Series

More on:

Global Governance

International Organizations

Regional Organizations

Number of Regional and UN Peace Operations by Region, 1946–2016

UN Uniformed Peacekeepers Worldwide and in Africa

Development Banks' Estimated Loan Portfolios in 2025 (in billions USD)

Chapter Downloads

More on:

Global Governance

International Organizations

Regional Organizations

Top Stories on CFR

Climate Change

Global

Link

Saudi Arabia

Relations between the two countries, long bound by common interests in oil and security, have strained over what some analysts see as a more assertive Saudi foreign policy.